Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

If Chelsea are having to offer Colwill to Brighton to cover part of the £50M for their fullback purchase, then that suggests they won’t get close to £80M for another Centre Back, and they wanted the Brighton fullback at £50M far more than they wanted Fofana - at the £80M mark.

Posted (edited)

I personally wouldnt want to be in chelseas back pocket like this. They take fofana, then if we are slightly right in our judgement on Colwill and he's decent they poach him back for a reasonable fee. 

 

Not how we close the gap with........ them! Which is our underlining ambition after all ( no matter how hard it would be )  

 

Keep fofana, explain to him why... he's a big boy... he'll get on with it. 

 

Sell him to a super power for 100m in a years time. 

 

I think this is actually good news in the grand scheme of things , Fofana is 1000x the player colwill is, or will become. 

Edited by Lambert09
  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, FoxesWalk said:

Is a better player imo 

Says who? depends what you want from a wing back.

 

35 games 1 goal 1 assist 

 

Chillwell played 7 games before getting injured 3 goals 1 assist.

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, lcfcsnow said:

Brighton, Palace and Newcastle on the verge of overtaking us now I'd say, whilst we just standstill.

Absolutely yes, Brighton selling one of their best players definitely places them ahead of us. And as for Newcastle, PHWAAAR they’ve upgraded their ice bins to paddling pools. So they’re a shoe in for 1st place. 
 

Damn you Wellens, it’s all your fault! 

Posted
1 minute ago, Spudulike said:

Is the Colwill to Brighton a loan deal? Perhaps that's why we are not interested. :dunno:

Nope. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Spudulike said:

Is the Colwill to Brighton a loan deal? Perhaps that's why we are not interested. :dunno:

Nah permanent, but Chelsea have a buy back clause

Posted
5 minutes ago, FoxesWalk said:

Is a better player imo 

Cucarella? He is yes. Chilly is done at Chelsea now I think. Probably a rotation player.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, moore_94 said:

Nah permanent, but Chelsea have a buy back clause

absolute scenes when they’ve used this to get the deal for cucurella done, instantly use the buy back clause and use him to get fofana 

Posted
26 minutes ago, South Shire Fox said:

Another quality young player missed out on because of an abysmal transfer window by Rodgers last year

By Rodgers...?

Posted
9 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

Perhaps the player didn’t want to move to the midlands ?

 

his home is soton and he can live somewhere between Brighton and there 

Pretty obvious isn’t it

Posted
16 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said:

Pretty obvious isn’t it

Plus the fact that he’ll play because they always employ a three 

what would he have been here ? Third or fourth choice ? (Assuming wes isn’t leaving which is our stance ) 

Posted

Cucurella is a very tidy signing. Thought Man City should have bagged him. Cancelo and Cucurella as full backs would be delicious.

 

No way will we sell Fofana to Chelsea this summer now. Unless we have some mad young CB lined up that we've not heard any links to. Imagine we sold Fofana and then signed Bednerak 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, lcfcsnow said:

Brighton, Palace and Newcastle on the verge of overtaking us now I'd say, whilst we just standstill.

.....well with Kasper going out the door, we can bring someone in if we choose to use one of our current keepers!!!

Posted
23 hours ago, ARM1968 said:

Bellend. Colwill, Chilly, Chelsea pay their wages for the duration of their contracts with us AND £60 million. 
 

No idea some people how to negotiate. 

Bellend lol 

  • Haha 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...