Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
LCFCb0y

Man City make £50million offer for Riyad Mahrez?

By LCFCb0y, in Transfer Talk

Recommended Posts

VLC86

VLC86

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Adster said:

Sounds slightly racist, But Africans and Algerians have no ****ing clue how real football works.

 

Watching then post shit on everything single LCFC post/status cringes the shit outta me.

Don’t come on here after being suspended by a West Ham.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Buzzell

Buzzell

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, Wymeswold fox said:

The club could, and should, punish him for refusing to go about expected duties, which would be quite correct in this instance.

They should fine him for not turning up for training twice. Whether that would help the situation currently I doubt it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kyleolly

kyleolly

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, Adster said:

Sounds slightly racist, But Africans and Algerians have no ****ing clue how real football works.

 

Watching then post shit on everything single LCFC post/status cringes the shit outta me.

It doesn’t sound racist it is racist, plenty of white ppl know jack all about football and one of the lads Rachid Mandi JNR is very knowledgeable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Adster

Adster

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, kyleolly said:

It doesn’t sound racist it is racist, plenty of white ppl know jack all about football and one of the lads Rachid Mandi JNR is very knowledgeable.

I never said they did. Go and look on any LCFC related post on any social media channel though, and you'll see it's largely bandwagon Africans and Algerians who know **** all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dan LCFC

Dan LCFC

Posted
Posted

A lot of them aren't remotely bothered by us and shouldn't be on LCFC pages. They're following their national teams players, which is fair enough, but the way they talk about us is a joke. They're perfect examples of the absolute parasites that the sport has sold out to now and should be treated as such. You get a few sound ones (the fox on here for example I think is fine) but the majority of the ones on Facebook and Twitter are scrotes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MPH

MPH

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Dan LCFC said:

A lot of them aren't remotely bothered by us and shouldn't be on LCFC pages. They're following their national teams players, which is fair enough, but the way they talk about us is a joke. They're perfect examples of the absolute parasites that the sport has sold out to now and should be treated as such. You get a few sound ones (the fox on here for example I think is fine) but the majority of the ones on Facebook and Twitter are scrotes.

 

 

Nothing wrong with being concerned for the players that play for your national team.. why SHOULD they put Leicester's interests first?

 

 

Just don't worry about them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Alf Bentley

Alf Bentley

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
48 minutes ago, Gerard said:

 

I can't get my head round people saying we should be submissive and be grateful to accept what we were offered.

 

It's like we should have been proud to see "our boy" make a move to the big league and be happy for the crumbs off their table and a patronising ruffle of our hair.

 

Arsenal offered £12m for Jonny Evans in the last few hours of the window and it was rightly dismissed because it didn't meet their valuation and teams want a premium if they're expected to sell key players with no time to adequately replace them. I don't see Evans having a hissy fit.

:thumbup:

 

Imagine if Barcelona had made a low bid for De Bruyne in the last 2 days of the transfer window?

Would these commentators be saying that Man City should have let him go on the cheap to enjoy his "dream move"?

With no prospect of Man City securing a last-minute replacement for a key player, disrupting their hopes for the season?

 

This claim from Man City that they didn't just see Mahrez as a replacement for the injured Sane makes it WORSE for me.

If their bid for Riyad was triggered by Sane's injury, I'd find their case quite reasonable: they were short of quality attackers, quite rated Riyad (but not that much) and so made a late bid at their valuation.

If they're being honest in claiming they wanted him all along, we have to assume they only made a late bid because they knew Riyad would kick off and thought they could bully us into accepting a late, low bid.

If they DID want him all along and made an honest valuation of him, why didn't they make a bid in early Jan? We'd have then had time to try to find a replacement - and they might have got him at the price they wanted.

 

The more I think about Man City's conduct, the further they sink in my estimation - though maybe it was just a half-arsed attempt to cover for Sane's injury and they're now lying to massage Riyad's ego in case they want him in the summer? 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
UPinCarolina

UPinCarolina

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Adster said:

I never said they did. Go and look on any LCFC related post on any social media channel though, and you'll see it's largely bandwagon Africans and Algerians who know **** all.

I'm almost certain that the language barrier plays a role in that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dan LCFC

Dan LCFC

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, MPH said:

 

 

Nothing wrong with being concerned for the players that play for your national team.. why SHOULD they put Leicester's interests first?

 

 

Just don't worry about them.

It's the complete lack of respect I can't stand. They've got a lot to thank Leicester for with Mahrez. We gave him a platform and he took it. We've helped them have a star player on their hands through the actions we as a club have taken. They're more bothered about him leaving us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CosbehFox

CosbehFox

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Dan LCFC said:

It's the complete lack of respect I can't stand. They've got a lot to thank Leicester for with Mahrez. We gave him a platform and he took it. We've helped them have a star player on their hands through the actions we as a club have taken. They're more bothered about him leaving us.

The most baffling thing I find with the Algerian fans is that he missed a MUST WIN World Cup qualifier to sit in an airport without there being any deal in place 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MC Prussian

MC Prussian

Posted
Posted

Logic must've passed by this MCFC fan:

Quote

a club clinging on to a player who wants to leave is like someone clinging onto a partner who has made it clear they no longer love them and want to go.

Yes, they're both very comparable.

:facepalm:

http://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/threads/riyad-mahrez.323198/page-466#post-10779689

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Qwerty

Qwerty

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, RODNEY FERNIO said:

Wonder if the big clubs are going to think twice about buying Mahrez in the summer

if he continues to throw his toys out of the pram ?

 

They'd have to, surely.  I mean, if no one sees him play well between now and May, why would they want him?  He's got no choice but to dust himself down and get on with it.  I guess the only thing that might happen is that if he downs tools, then Leicester might not want to keep paying his wages, so would offload him cheaply in the summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jammie82uk

jammie82uk

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, RODNEY FERNIO said:

Wonder if the big clubs are going to think twice about buying Mahrez in the summer

if he continues to throw his toys out of the pram ?

 

Possibly but he’s not the first to do it and certainly won’t be the last 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Matt

Matt

Posted
Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, RODNEY FERNIO said:

Wonder if the big clubs are going to think twice about buying Mahrez in the summer

if he continues to throw his toys out of the pram ?

 

It's not going to impress potential suitors put it that way.

 

I was listening to the radio earlier and someone 'close' to Man City claimed it was down to the price (Obviously) but also because they want the right people round the club and had abit of doubt about how he's conducted himself.

 

So take the Man City scenario for example, if he went yesterday he'd play for Man City for about 6 weeks whilst Sane is injured, after that he'd drop to the bench and it'd be welcome to Danny Drinkwater's world, I firmly believe that, he'd be a squad player at Man City, he wouldn't get regular starts, not in that team, so what happens a year (If that) down the line when he starts crying about not playing, wanting a move, because Mahrez is a player that needs to play.

 

You can use that scenario in alot of the 'top' clubs...all of course his 'dream move'. That's not to say he wouldn't get a start in any of the 'top' clubs, of course he would somewhere but the majority, nah, I don't see it and they will be questioning his temprament - Possibly why there has been so little interest in him in the past.

 

Edited by Matt
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox92

Fox92

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, MC Prussian said:

Logic must've passed by this MCFC fan:

Yes, they're both very comparable.

:facepalm:

http://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/threads/riyad-mahrez.323198/page-466#post-10779689

Man City fans are like those kids who think they deserve more because they've got more money.

 

They are annoying. The new "fans" probably supported Chelsea a decade ago. 

 

I'm glad we didn't give into them. I'd rather him go to Man United over Man City. At least their fans, or at least the majority, are always level headed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ARM1968

ARM1968

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, RODNEY FERNIO said:

Wonder if the big clubs are going to think twice about buying Mahrez in the summer

if he continues to throw his toys out of the pram ?

 

The big clubs have shown no real interest in him at all. Man City only bothered to fill a short term injury problem. Despite whatever crap they’re spouting if they truly wanted him they would have moved in it sooner. 

 

Barca don’t want him, Real Madrid don’t want him. PSG might in the summer. 

 

Hes good enough for all of them, it’s his attitude that lets him down. Doubt they’ll touch him again. Man City might, but I wouldn’t be holding my breath. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MC Prussian

MC Prussian

Posted
Posted

The comments from the Algerian football "fans" on the Thursday Night Live post on the LCFC Facebook page are hilarious and hilariously imbecile.

 

"Hope you lose all your matches"

"Hope your stadium will be bombed"

"Mahrez has given what Leicester would have never dreamed to accomplish, it's a bit harsh and selfish to deny him his dream."

And calling us greedy in the context with Manchester City, who're trying to buy the league. lol

 

Yeah, listen.

 

#freemehrez

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...