Jattdogg Posted 20 June 2018 Share Posted 20 June 2018 1 minute ago, ozleicester said: i dunno what ive done there ^ Failed. Shame! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxfanazer Posted 20 June 2018 Share Posted 20 June 2018 Just now, ozleicester said: i dunno what ive done there ^ I thought it was one of your better posts personally 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Simi Posted 20 June 2018 Popular Post Share Posted 20 June 2018 Pleased we're holding our ground. £75m or off you trot. This will strengthen our hand when the top European clubs come calling for the likes of Maguire and N'Didi as well. 13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Voll Blau Posted 20 June 2018 Popular Post Share Posted 20 June 2018 1 hour ago, SecretPro said: THE DEAL IS DEAD BOYS, AND IT'S SO LONELY ON THE WIIIIING... 2 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SecretPro Posted 20 June 2018 Share Posted 20 June 2018 1 minute ago, Voll Blau said: BOYS, AND IT'S SO LONELY ON THE WIIIIING... Good man! massive Smiths fan over here 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post martyn Posted 20 June 2018 Popular Post Share Posted 20 June 2018 1 minute ago, Voll Blau said: BOYS, AND IT'S SO LONELY ON THE WIIIIING... Oh take me away from dear old Leicester Put me on the train for Manchester Take me anywhere Drop me anywhere Roma, Barca, Manchester I just don't care. 4 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhYesNdidi Posted 20 June 2018 Share Posted 20 June 2018 13 minutes ago, richardsfoxes said: Ive read so many misinformed media outlets that i honestly don't even know the situation, so let me get this straight the original deal was 60M + Roberts but we've decided we don't want Roberts so want 75M and they don't want to budge? I think man city offered £50m + Roberts but we wanted a deal worth £75m. (Roberts valued at around £15m) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lgfualol Posted 20 June 2018 Share Posted 20 June 2018 I just got told 13 goals and 13 assists in a season does justify 75m. Are people forgetting he plays for Leicester and pulls in better stats than players like Hazard? mad 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted Maul Posted 20 June 2018 Share Posted 20 June 2018 This is tedious. Glad we've dropped out of the Roberts deal though, we can and must do better than that. Hopefully Man City drop out of the deal so someone will come in who isn't making some moral stand against modern transfer fees (despite massively contributing to their inflation over the last few years) and is actually willing to pay the asking price. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st albans fox Posted 20 June 2018 Share Posted 20 June 2018 59 minutes ago, lgfualol said: Fed up of reading that we have betrayed him. He has had 2 clubs in for him, poverty Roma and Man City, not like we are refusing hundreds of bids to make his life a misery. maybe that says we are asking too much for him in the market .................... (as judged by other clubs) its a bit like vardy - he is worth 50m+ to us but no one will pay anything like that so the likelihood is he stays with us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chapero82 Posted 20 June 2018 Share Posted 20 June 2018 (edited) Edited 20 June 2018 by chapero82 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SecretPro Posted 20 June 2018 Share Posted 20 June 2018 This Nixon fella clearly knows **** all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
urban.spaceman Posted 20 June 2018 Share Posted 20 June 2018 1 hour ago, Spudulike said: Some great comments Nice to know that we are a poor club " 2 hours ago KimboSlice Nobody wants inconsistent and overpriced Mahrez. Let him just stay LOSEster City. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCFC Posted 20 June 2018 Share Posted 20 June 2018 15 hours ago, Naz said: Roberts was a huge favourite at Celtic. He had an injury this season. They were desperate to keep him. You should know that As for Mahrez, Leicester are trying it on, and why wouldn't they. But they'll have to back down. £70m is more than fair for a player who has wanted to leave for some time. All of that is true and at no point did I deny it. The injury wasn't as bad as initially thought and he was back in full training as early as March but didn't do enough to earn his place back. They wanted to keep him and he chose to go back despite M. City insisting that his only chance of breaking into our first team is if he spent a season on loan at a Premier League club. To me (and the club) that shows a lack of ambition. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerard Posted 20 June 2018 Share Posted 20 June 2018 38 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said: " 2 hours ago KimboSlice Nobody wants inconsistent and overpriced Mahrez. Let him just stay LOSEster City. " What kind of cunt calls themselves Kimbo Slice? No offence @Kimbo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCFC Posted 20 June 2018 Share Posted 20 June 2018 16 hours ago, The Doctor said: Yeah, I mean it's not like he was playing some of the best football he's ever played for us, then went off for a few weeks citing depression and came back looking a shadow of the player before the attempted move. It really wasn't our fault that he reacted like that, we didn't want him to go AWOL and we certainly didn't ask him to. My point is he was desperate to move back in the summer when we weren't actually interested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Doctor Posted 20 June 2018 Share Posted 20 June 2018 2 minutes ago, MCFC said: It really wasn't our fault that he reacted like that, we didn't want him to go AWOL and we certainly didn't ask him to. My point is he was desperate to move back in the summer when we weren't actually interested. You can't seriously claim that you didn't unsettle him though. Yeah he wanted to move, but he was still knuckling down and playing well, playing for the move until you came in and took the Michael. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clever Fox Posted 20 June 2018 Share Posted 20 June 2018 1 hour ago, st albans fox said: maybe that says we are asking too much for him in the market .................... (as judged by other clubs) its a bit like vardy - he is worth 50m+ to us but no one will pay anything like that so the likelihood is he stays with us. it's not a bit like Vardy, Yes, Vardy may be worth 50m to us but his all round me isn't good enough for others to spend that amount on him. Although I do agree he is improving his game year on year and that's to his credit. Mahrez has risen to become a top player and worthy of a place in any team. Yes he still needs to polish up a few areas of his game. But his ability to deliver Goals both himself or by assists singles him out into a special class of player. He's a far better player than Sterling and he will be a star at Man City if he goes there. As to the Fee,Is anyone ever worth the crazy Fees being quoted today. But in the case of Mahrez I'd say he's worth every penny of our asking price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy Kop Corner Posted 20 June 2018 Share Posted 20 June 2018 2 hours ago, Simi said: Pleased we're holding our ground. £75m or off you trot. This will strengthen our hand when the top European clubs come calling for the likes of Maguire and N'Didi as well. Great post. Spot on in terms of ring fencing our best players and not being pushed around by these so called 'Big Clubs@. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxyPalace.com Posted 20 June 2018 Share Posted 20 June 2018 17 minutes ago, Crazy Kop Corner said: Great post. Spot on in terms of ring fencing our best players and not being pushed around by these so called 'Big Clubs@. Man City are a Rich Club, not a Big Club. Real Madrid, Barcelona, Manchester United are BIG CLUBS. Christ they cannot even fill their stadium, something all the teams above easily do. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerard Posted 20 June 2018 Share Posted 20 June 2018 10 minutes ago, FoxyPalace.com said: Man City are a Rich Club, not a Big Club. Real Madrid, Barcelona, Manchester United are BIG CLUBS. Christ they cannot even fill their stadium, something all the teams above easily do. They're a big club nowadays, no question. They're financially self sufficient nowadays. I couldn't care less about historically, everything evolves. It would be like Derby or Forest claiming to be a bigger club than us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamlcfcbevo85 Posted 20 June 2018 Share Posted 20 June 2018 10 minutes ago, Gerard said: They're a big club nowadays, no question. They're financially self sufficient nowadays. I couldn't care less about historically, everything evolves. It would be like Derby or Forest claiming to be a bigger club than us. I honestly beleave all this spending man city have done is going to bite them in the arse they will fall in the future and go into administration. They have literally not achieved anything without buying it amd such a huge expense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sphericalfox Posted 20 June 2018 Share Posted 20 June 2018 1 minute ago, adamlcfcbevo85 said: I honestly beleave all this spending man city have done is going to bite them in the arse they will fall in the future and go into administration. They have literally not achieved anything without buying it amd such a huge expense Wrong. They have one of the most modern and expensive academies in the world now. Their intention is to build a bedrock of a team after winning trophies and supplement the team in the long run through the academy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voll Blau Posted 20 June 2018 Share Posted 20 June 2018 1 hour ago, FoxyPalace.com said: Man City are a Rich Club, not a Big Club. Real Madrid, Barcelona, Manchester United are BIG CLUBS. Christ they cannot even fill their stadium, something all the teams above easily do. To be fair, it's actually kind of refreshing that they don't get all the tourists there and that it's, by and large, the same 40k Mancs who would've watched them in the third division less than 20 years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finnegan Posted 20 June 2018 Share Posted 20 June 2018 31 minutes ago, FoxyPalace.com said: Man City are a Rich Club, not a Big Club. Real Madrid, Barcelona, Manchester United are BIG CLUBS. Christ they cannot even fill their stadium, something all the teams above easily do. A rich club is a big club. All other criteria died years ago if it ever really existed. The "big" clubs are just the rich clubs that have been rich long enough. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts