Guest Markyblue Posted 30 July 2019 Share Posted 30 July 2019 58 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said: That’s a Slimani, a Musa, AND a Silva. Or 70 vardys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yorkie1999 Posted 30 July 2019 Share Posted 30 July 2019 1 minute ago, Markyblue said: Or 70 vardys Or 175 Mahrez’s 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
urban.spaceman Posted 30 July 2019 Share Posted 30 July 2019 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Ric Flair said: That's Maguire's sister, a known avid Utd fan. I like her beard. Edited 30 July 2019 by urban.spaceman 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detroit Blues Posted 30 July 2019 Share Posted 30 July 2019 16 minutes ago, rachhere said: It's nice counting the potential money and all, but if selling means we compromise on qualifying for Europe and also on league places, is it really that much profit in the long-run? I was open to selling at the start of the transfer window, but we needed a decent preseason with whoever came in instead, and that's just not happened. If he really was a priority for Man U, they should have got in there far earlier. Time to shut the door on this one. Sorry Big H. When you do the math it might not make economic sense. Let's assume we sell Maguire late in the window, and do not have time to secure a replacement (and get him up to speed) until next summer: Based on @Xen 80m - 17m = 63m profit. (The £17m is ours to keep) 15% of 63m = 9.45m sell-on fee to Hull 80m - 9.45m = 70.55m into Leicester's coffers. Then let's say the difference in keeping Maguire vs losing him is finishing 6th vs 10th (My personal assumption): Prize Money 6th - £28.5million 10th - £20.9million Difference = £7.6million So £70.55M Reduced by £7.6M in prize money (6th vs 10th place finish) = £62.95M Facility Fee (money earned from # of TV matches) Big 6 clubs host more TV games than other 14 clubs, regardless of what happens in the table, but each additional TV appearance was worth about £1.13M. Let's assume Leicester are on TV 4 more times minimum = £4.5M £62.95M Reduced by £4.5M in Facility Fees (6th vs 10th place finish) = £58.45M Europa League Finishing 6th would qualify us for the group stage: Participation Bonus €2.6 million (Guaranteed) for each 40 teams who play in the group stages Performance Bonus €570,000 for every win & €190,000 for a draw Group Stage Bonus €1 million to group winners and €500,000 for group runnerups At minimum, we'd be looking at £2.3M just for showing up and losing each game of the group stage. At best, we'd make £6.43M for winning the group (and each game). If we continued a run through the Europa League, it would be possible to win up to £20-30M in the competition. But let's just be conservative, and say we won £5M in the Europa League, including the prize money, the ticket sales, the extra merchandise, etc. £58.45M Reduced by £5M in Europa League money = £53.45 So that £53M is what we'd have to spend to replace a premier league, international team quality centerback. Meanwhile, we just wasted a year of having Maddison, Vardy, Tielemans, etc. all under a manager like Brendan Rodgers. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That_Dude Posted 30 July 2019 Share Posted 30 July 2019 2 hours ago, Abrasive fox said: My understanding is two major stumbling blocks, most of which won't surprise anyone: 1. The fee, it is not agreed, theres still some considerable distance. 2. The payment terms, man utd want to incentivise a lot of it. Man utd are really confident it will get done, like theres plans already for his unveiling. I think they think theyll either agree the fee and it'll be heavily incentivised, or they'll pay more up front and get it agreed. I'm pretty sure we're not up for that, however Maguire's agent is pushing very very hard and Maguire is indeed quite keen, he'll virtually triple his wages. I think it'll get done. I also dont think Tarkowski or Dunk will be the replacement. Thank you very, very much for this insightful post. The first in a very long time. I also do think that we won't see him in a Leicester shirt next season but will get paid handsomely (my wild guess is something like 80M + add-ons in whatever form). I never thought that he'll be here for more than 3 seasons and bear him no ill grudges if he goes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Les-TA-Jon Posted 30 July 2019 Share Posted 30 July 2019 We should only sell if the figure and structure of the deal is correct AND if he actively wants to leave. Especially this late in the window. Whats the point in selling for £80m+, strengthening a direct rival, weakening our team, losing our best central defender and signing a sub par replacement for £30-50m!? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corky Posted 30 July 2019 Share Posted 30 July 2019 So Maguire, having been ill, wasn't too furious to turn up to work today, then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richieboy Posted 30 July 2019 Share Posted 30 July 2019 Maguire from reports is losing patience with the club. i assume losing patience with Man U because it seems they have known all along how much Leicester want and keep stalling on the amount and either wont or don't want to pay what Leicester want. If they wont pay then tough he stays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Oxlong Posted 30 July 2019 Share Posted 30 July 2019 4 minutes ago, Corky said: So Maguire, having been ill, wasn't too furious to turn up to work today, then? He had to be corked 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dahnsouff Posted 30 July 2019 Share Posted 30 July 2019 For no other reason than I am curious. Does anyone know what the original bid was? And if a higher/different second bid followed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silva Fox Posted 30 July 2019 Share Posted 30 July 2019 Only 9 more Groundhog days to go! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
49er Posted 30 July 2019 Share Posted 30 July 2019 20 minutes ago, Detroit Blues said: When you do the math it might not make economic sense. Let's assume we sell Maguire late in the window, and do not have time to secure a replacement (and get him up to speed) until next summer: Based on @Xen 80m - 17m = 63m profit. (The £17m is ours to keep) 15% of 63m = 9.45m sell-on fee to Hull 80m - 9.45m = 70.55m into Leicester's coffers. Then let's say the difference in keeping Maguire vs losing him is finishing 6th vs 10th (My personal assumption): Prize Money 6th - £28.5million 10th - £20.9million Difference = £7.6million So £70.55M Reduced by £7.6M in prize money (6th vs 10th place finish) = £62.95M Facility Fee (money earned from # of TV matches) Big 6 clubs host more TV games than other 14 clubs, regardless of what happens in the table, but each additional TV appearance was worth about £1.13M. Let's assume Leicester are on TV 4 more times minimum = £4.5M £62.95M Reduced by £4.5M in Facility Fees (6th vs 10th place finish) = £58.45M Europa League Finishing 6th would qualify us for the group stage: Participation Bonus €2.6 million (Guaranteed) for each 40 teams who play in the group stages Performance Bonus €570,000 for every win & €190,000 for a draw Group Stage Bonus €1 million to group winners and €500,000 for group runnerups At minimum, we'd be looking at £2.3M just for showing up and losing each game of the group stage. At best, we'd make £6.43M for winning the group (and each game). If we continued a run through the Europa League, it would be possible to win up to £20-30M in the competition. But let's just be conservative, and say we won £5M in the Europa League, including the prize money, the ticket sales, the extra merchandise, etc. £58.45M Reduced by £5M in Europa League money = £53.45 So that £53M is what we'd have to spend to replace a premier league, international team quality centerback. Meanwhile, we just wasted a year of having Maddison, Vardy, Tielemans, etc. all under a manager like Brendan Rodgers. We have already wasted three years of Vardy and two of Mahrez since we won the Premier League. Let’s hope with Brendan at the helm we will see a serious assault on the top six as opposed to a battle to finish above the likes of Bournemouth and Burnley 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micky Posted 30 July 2019 Share Posted 30 July 2019 2 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said: For no other reason than I am curious. Does anyone know what the original bid was? And if a higher/different second bid followed? 70 million from both United and City. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dahnsouff Posted 30 July 2019 Share Posted 30 July 2019 (edited) 1 minute ago, Micky said: 70 million from both United and City. Not all up front though I assume? Sorry for all the questions, but has there been any 2nd bids? Edited 30 July 2019 by Dahnsouff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Tielemans63 Posted 30 July 2019 Popular Post Share Posted 30 July 2019 This thread.... 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
49er Posted 30 July 2019 Share Posted 30 July 2019 46 minutes ago, treer said: If we sell Mags, it weakens us for qualifying for europe. Losing Mags could cost us very important points City should have an add on whereas if we miss europa by less than 4 point £20m less than 7 points, and they pay us £10m I think our success will be more dependent on the likes of Tielemans, Maddison, Ricardo and Chillwell having outstanding seasons. If that happens our emphasis will be more on attack than defence. Since Harry has been here our defence hasn’t improved and it has been our weak point. No disrespect to Harry but he’s not a top notch defender. I would far rather lose him than Vardy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post UpTheLeagueFox Posted 30 July 2019 Popular Post Share Posted 30 July 2019 5 minutes ago, 49er said: Since Harry has been here our defence hasn’t improved and it has been our weak point. No disrespect to Harry but he’s not a top notch defender. I would far rather lose him than Vardy If you'd said at the end of last season we'd lose Maguire (and presumably sign a replacement) but keep Chilwell, Maddison (+Vardy) and get Tielemans on a permanent and bring in Perez too, I think most fans would've been delighted with that kind of business. 11 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluetintedspecs Posted 30 July 2019 Share Posted 30 July 2019 4 hours ago, Thecarrickfan said: Di Marzio has said that we've agreed a fee with you for Harry Maguire. I do hope he also posts the number for the Samaritans, I'm truly concerned for your wellbeing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treer Posted 30 July 2019 Share Posted 30 July 2019 (edited) Agree with all that 49er, except i would put them all about equal, lose any of them and it will cost us points. That's why we should have tha adds on for lost points, in the utd and Harry situation Edited 30 July 2019 by treer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M0901 Posted 30 July 2019 Share Posted 30 July 2019 So it's taken 322 pages to establish absolutely nothing has happened? Can't be arsed to read through this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silva Fox Posted 30 July 2019 Share Posted 30 July 2019 4 hours ago, Thecarrickfan said: Di Marzio has said that we've agreed a fee with you for Harry Maguire. https://www.teamtalk.com/news/man-utd-source-puts-huge-dampener-on-chances-of-harry-maguire-deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley Posted 30 July 2019 Share Posted 30 July 2019 3 minutes ago, M0901 said: So it's taken 322 pages to establish absolutely nothing has happened? Can't be arsed to read through this. Yes. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SheppyFox Posted 30 July 2019 Share Posted 30 July 2019 8 minutes ago, UpTheLeagueFox said: If you'd said at the end of last season we'd lose Maguire (and presumably sign a replacement) but keep Chilwell, Maddison (+Vardy) and get Tielemans on a permanent and bring in Perez too, I think most fans would've been delighted with that kind of business. Yes. I’d still love another winger/attacking midfielder & striker mind you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
49er Posted 30 July 2019 Share Posted 30 July 2019 3 minutes ago, treer said: Agree with all that 49er, except i would put them all about equal, lose any of them and it will cost us points. That's why we should have tha adds on for lost points, in the utd and Harry situation it would be great to keep everyone but 80m cannot be sniffed at . Harry has only been here two seasons when we have been mediocre. In terms of feeling bad about someone moving on he’s nowhere close to the likes of Kante and Mahrez Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronnup Posted 30 July 2019 Share Posted 30 July 2019 They can chuck Martial in and have him for 40 mill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts