ARM1968 Posted 31 July 2019 Posted 31 July 2019 24 minutes ago, LinekersApples said: You're not really a team unless you have an England number 6 Three of em? Now that is Satanic. 2
UniFox21 Posted 31 July 2019 Posted 31 July 2019 32 minutes ago, LinekersApples said: You're not really a team unless you have an England number 6 Average head size there is fooking massive
Lambert09 Posted 31 July 2019 Posted 31 July 2019 If we sign Tarkowski we would be the smallest team in the league surely? Back to loathing corners we go
mozartfox Posted 31 July 2019 Posted 31 July 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, SheppyFox said: I smell poppycock talk. You may need a shower? Edited 31 July 2019 by mozartfox 1
smitha Posted 31 July 2019 Posted 31 July 2019 1 hour ago, Lambert09 said: I get that but its about the club not about individuals getting a fair chance. I wouldnt be sat complaining if we signed a new CB but we still lined up with CS in the first game. Id just look at the squad and be confident that the best CB will win the dual. If it did turn out to be CS great! Fair enough perhaps giving them a chance was the wrong word, but they haven't played 5 league games between them surely the club thought they were good enough or they wouldn't have brought them. I'm sure Rogers has it covered either way, he has seen Benkovic and Soyuncu and is aware of what they bring so if HM does leave it will be interesting to see what he does.
SheppyFox Posted 31 July 2019 Posted 31 July 2019 3 hours ago, LinekersApples said: Tarkowski and Dunk are very good. Either would walk into a Maguire shaped hole and would presently be better equipped than Soyuncu or Benkovic (who will both be very good players in time). The cost is the concern, but it's not our money and those whose it is, know exactly what they are doing. Excellent business men and women with good advisers, including a world class manager/coach. Everyone relax. It's going to be some season! If we sign a top class winger it should be top 4. ? 1
Matt Posted 1 August 2019 Posted 1 August 2019 (edited) Tarkowski > Dunk. Pay the reported £50m realise clause. Accept the mighty £3.5m(ish) profit on Maguire as a kick in the teeth and learn...learn ?? Oh Sean, all those pound notes! ? Edited 1 August 2019 by Matt
jeffschlupp Posted 3 August 2019 Posted 3 August 2019 Not in the Burnley squad this afternoon due to an 'injury niggle'. Sounds like transferitis to me... 2
Silva Fox Posted 3 August 2019 Posted 3 August 2019 5 minutes ago, jeffschlupp said: Not in the Burnley squad this afternoon due to an 'injury niggle'. Sounds like transferitis to me... Interesting!
LC/FC Posted 3 August 2019 Posted 3 August 2019 17 minutes ago, jeffschlupp said: Not in the Burnley squad this afternoon due to an 'injury niggle'. Sounds like transferitis to me... Ahh that poor illness that can only be cured with a huge injection of 'many pound notes'* *May have missed out several 'manys' 1
psychonaut Posted 3 August 2019 Posted 3 August 2019 I think £35M and they’d bite. I’m not sure how much they paid for him but knowing Burnley, not a lot. They’re a selling club. Now I sound like a ManU fan ? 2
dbtcity Posted 3 August 2019 Posted 3 August 2019 We'll snap him up for 35/40m and they’ll replace him with Gary Cahill... just seems like a total Burnley move 2
Matt Posted 3 August 2019 Posted 3 August 2019 Not sure how true it is but i'm sure it was reported Tarkowski had a £50m release clause, if true why would they accept less?
Max Power Posted 3 August 2019 Posted 3 August 2019 He’ll do for me. As long as the pound notes aren’t too plentiful.
Raw Dykes Posted 3 August 2019 Posted 3 August 2019 Looks like this might be happening, then. I'd much rather him than Dunk, especially given the rumoured fee for Dunk. Tarkowski's 2 years younger, as well. I just hope we don't get rinsed half as badly as Man Utd did by us. Shouldn't be too difficult! (can't find the Woodward gobbling Rudkin off emoji) 1
Buzzell Posted 3 August 2019 Posted 3 August 2019 Quick, someone jump onto a Burnley forum and see what the fuss is about?!
UniFox21 Posted 3 August 2019 Posted 3 August 2019 1 minute ago, Matt said: Not sure how true it is but i'm sure it was reported Tarkowski had a £50m release clause, if true why would they accept less? Wasn't it the release clause to top 6 teams? 2
Matt Posted 3 August 2019 Posted 3 August 2019 Just now, UniFox21 said: Wasn't it the release clause to top 6 teams? I'm not sure, all I heard was there was a release clause of £50m so you may well be correct in what you say.
Raw Dykes Posted 3 August 2019 Posted 3 August 2019 1 minute ago, Matt said: Not sure how true it is but i'm sure it was reported Tarkowski had a £50m release clause, if true why would they accept less? A release clause just means the club have to accept that amount if it's offered. That doesn't mean they won't or can't accept anything less. They might think taking the £35m and picking up Cahill on a free to replace JT is good business. Might well be. 1
VLC86 Posted 3 August 2019 Posted 3 August 2019 I injured my niggles the other night, i wouldn’t recommend it.
Recommended Posts