How much is Maguire worth?

[Saxondale]

Player 'values' are meaningless.

[murphy]

£50m

 

Unless it's Man City in which case it's £150m.

[Dan]

He'll be linked for something derisory like all our players seem to be.

[HKFox]

Certainly in the bracket 70 million plus. An awful lot of money, but considering VVD went to Liverpool for 75, Mcguire will be just as good and has potential to be one of best cbs in the league. We can not afford to lose him this summer. Need to build team with a solid spine and he is key to that. 

[urban.spaceman]

Quite simply, he's not for sale. Only a bid of something insane like £100m should be considered. The way this market is going £50m would be a shockingly poor deal for us.

[tsintskaro]

he is young,englishman and plays for country in world cup and at least is not rubbish 

so doesnt matter what is hes actual value 

club should not sell him less then 70 

Edited 6 July 2018 by tsintskaro

[ozleicester]

It depends on the club buying, he isnt going anywhere other than top 4 English clubs. He wont want to go and the club wont let him.

 

So, if everton offer $80 million, it wont matter, but if Man U, Liverpool, Man city, Spurs or Arse offer $50 million + then... we need to be worried.

Edited 6 July 2018 by ozleicester

[Footballwipe]

6 hours ago, Dan LCFC said:

He'll be linked for something derisory like all our players seem to be.

Yep. If he was at Southampton he'd be sold for about £80m, as he's with us he'll probably go for £40m 

[coolhandfox]

The fact he's only year 1 of a 5 year contract makes a massive difference, as their is no short term threat of him running done his contact and leave for nothing unlike Mahrez who has only 18 months left.

 

He's only worth what someone is willing to pay and what we are willing to sell for.

 

8 hours ago, Vince Vega said:

Whatever. They can't afford him.

I'd image that what Barcelona thought about Neymar, lucky for us we don't have buy clauses in or contacts anymore since the Kante transfer.

[lgfualol]

At least 50m + a **** ton of addons. 

 

Dont think he would even want a move yet. Seems popular in the squad and only just got here.

[Daveb5569]

just look at what Liverpool paid for Van Dyke and he is not even at the world cup. Plus I think Harry has alot more to come.

Edited 6 July 2018 by Daveb5569

[RowlattsFox]

A lot depends on how much the buying club wants and needs him, Southampton were able to fleece Liverpool for Van Dijk because they knew they were desperate for a centre back. On ability I don't think Van Dijk does anything Maguire can't.

 

I'd be looking at £50m as bare minimum.

[Jonezy]

He is worth more for us, than anyone is ready to pay, so Big Harry stays here!

[mozartfox]

Depends on who the DoF is.   For example, there would be a vast difference in the valuation if say Levy was involved compared with the price the Rudmeister would realize.   

[Merging Cultures]

GBP80m and no way the owners would sell easily anyway. They have shown ambition and the willingness to play hardball to keep players or receive a fair price.

[Clever Fox]

We're not a selling club so it would take a big offer to let him go. If we can find another strong young children we'll be set for years to come.

[Poznan34]

Van Dijk was only that much because Liverpool had the Coutinho money.

[MrSpaM]

 

[Jacnah]

https://twitter.com/simonday24/status/1014951899982942208

[TeePee]

I think the VVD rate is a minor case of apples and oranges, as VVD had been a known quantity for a good few years prior to his move, whereas Maguire (who I feel on last season's showing was probably the better player) has just had one outstanding breakthrough season. How he goes next year will be a big factor.

The other factor is that, as Poznan pointed out, everyone knew Liverpool were rolling in that Coutinho money - that probably put as much as £25m on the value.

 

Personally, I reckon in the current market, about £45-50m would be a 'fair' price, but I don't see why we'd have any incentive to sell at a 'fair' price unless Maguire told us he wanted to leave. I wouldn't sell at a penny below £60m considering how potentially important he is to us over the next 2-3 years.

[lcfc278]

One hundred billion dollars!!

[foxfanazer]

£53.7m

[Out Foxed]

150

[David Hankey]

Maguire is worth more than Liverpool's Van Dijk. At least Harry is in the World Cup and making a fabulous impression.

[st albans fox]

1 hour ago, David Hankey said:

Maguire is worth more than Liverpool's Van Dijk. At least Harry is in the World Cup and making a fabulous impression.

 

5 hours ago, Daveb5569 said:

just look at what Liverpool paid for Van Dyke and he is not even at the world cup. Plus I think Harry has alot more to come.

 

a bit unfair to connect a nations inability to qualify to a centre halves value

 

also, lpool had to pay extra 20 m because of the illegal; approach last august