RowlattsFox Posted 5 October 2019 Posted 5 October 2019 Praet was impressive as the game went on, best player we have on the ball. But his signing has given us the problem with Maddison on the wing.
KingsX Posted 5 October 2019 Posted 5 October 2019 33 minutes ago, Finnegan said: Maddison down the middle = Leicester score goals. Maddison on the left wing = Leicester don't score goals. Sunk in yet?
foxes_rule1978 Posted 5 October 2019 Posted 5 October 2019 1 minute ago, Mehrez said: Clear dive no doubt
volpeazzurro Posted 5 October 2019 Posted 5 October 2019 Yes, Liverpool were spawny at the end but they could easily have been 4 up at half time. Again, as in nearly every other game this season, Rodgers has got his starting formation/selection wrong re Maddison on the left from the start and we improve when he moves behind Vardy second half.
cityfanlee23 Posted 5 October 2019 Posted 5 October 2019 6 minutes ago, Aus Fox said: How can you say he dived, but it’s still a penalty??? Because he dived AFTER the stupid clumsy contact, does Mane diving AFTER the contact change the fact that contact was made? Albrightons challenge takes mane off balance, then mane throws himself down. One does not negate the other. Mane threw himself down to make it worse than it was, but the contact was still a penalty, it's a really soft penalty, but albrighton still kicks him in the back of the foot and is nowhere near the ball.
Unabomber Posted 5 October 2019 Posted 5 October 2019 Surely Mane will get retrospectively punished for that dive? Can anyone confirm the rules
Steve Earle Posted 5 October 2019 Posted 5 October 2019 Albrighton 100% cost us the game. Not the ref’s fault for being conned, and it didn’t look a clear & obvious error on the replay I saw.
Fox seen in Norwich Posted 5 October 2019 Posted 5 October 2019 Over 90 mins Liverpool deserved to edge it. free hit and we narrowly missed but shows we’re competing for top 6 take pride, move on and kick on in two weeks
foxes_rule1978 Posted 5 October 2019 Posted 5 October 2019 Just now, cityfanlee23 said: Because he dived AFTER the stupid clumsy contact, does Mane diving AFTER the contact change the fact that contact was made? Albrightons challenge takes mane off balance, then mane throws himself down. One does not negate the other. It doesn’t take him off balance at all
smr Posted 5 October 2019 Posted 5 October 2019 3 minutes ago, Mehrez said: HOW can they not overturn that. WHY THE **** was VAR introduced?
Clever Fox Posted 5 October 2019 Posted 5 October 2019 Poor performance all day long. The one to blame for that defeat is Rogers.
Aus Fox Posted 5 October 2019 Posted 5 October 2019 1 minute ago, cityfanlee23 said: Because he dived AFTER the stupid clumsy contact, does Mane diving AFTER the contact change the fact that contact was made? Albrightons challenge takes mane off balance, then mane throws himself down. One does not negate the other. Mane threw himself down to make it worse than it was, but the contact was still a penalty. Contact doesn’t mean a penalty! You are allowed to make contact, the question is was there enough to take him down? No, FFS he holds the wrong ankle when he’s down! Not a penalty
vanity Posted 5 October 2019 Posted 5 October 2019 6 minutes ago, ttfn said: Clueless refereeing aside we didn’t deserve anything from that game. No shots until the 73rd minute isn’t good enough no matter who we’re playing. What the fuch does this even mean? We were tied against the reigning best team in the world at their house until stoppage. If we'd held, we'd have deserved it.
Guest BlueBrett Posted 5 October 2019 Posted 5 October 2019 man i'm ****ing fuming. need to calm down. I just keep repeating 'its ok, not that bad, remember Spurs lost 3-0 to Brighton" in my head like some kind of mantra. Even that's not really simmering me down yet though
shailen Posted 5 October 2019 Posted 5 October 2019 It's not enough to overturn VAR, it's as simple as that. Silly by albrighton, but once the referee blew for the penalty, it was never going to get overturned by VAR.
jon1bc Posted 5 October 2019 Posted 5 October 2019 4 minutes ago, ttfn said: Clueless refereeing aside we didn’t deserve anything from that game. No shots until the 73rd minute isn’t good enough no matter who we’re playing. 6 minutes ago, st albans fox said: Change the word ‘dive’ to ‘fell over’ change the word dive to cheating c u nt
smr Posted 5 October 2019 Posted 5 October 2019 im ****ing fuming at that penalty decision. absolutely unreal how that has been viewed as a penalty.
Brooksy Posted 5 October 2019 Posted 5 October 2019 Theres no ****ing way that's given at the other end. Sickening
katieakita Posted 5 October 2019 Posted 5 October 2019 Any ideas what kicked off at the end with Perez?
lgfualol Posted 5 October 2019 Posted 5 October 2019 Just now, Unabomber said: Was Var in use this game? Yeah but the ppl using it have no ****ing clue what theyre doing.
Tanya Posted 5 October 2019 Posted 5 October 2019 I am pretty annoyed but at least Spurs are self destructing.
cityfanlee23 Posted 5 October 2019 Posted 5 October 2019 3 minutes ago, Aus Fox said: Contact doesn’t mean a penalty! You are allowed to make contact, the question is was there enough to take him down? No, FFS he holds the wrong ankle when he’s down! Not a penalty You can foul someone without going down. It was a soft penalty, but it was a foul, get the blue specs off.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.