Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, ealingfox said:

 

Dont even think youd get half of that list with 130m tbh.

I think he means the wages?

Posted
1 minute ago, urban.spaceman said:

Ffs for the last time we don’t want Maguire back!

 

 

Christ is this moron still peddling his shite?

 

It's just embarrassing?

Posted
49 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

We'll keep fighting the good fight Pliskin. Education, education, education.

All we can do mate, inspire, lead and educate. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said:

Ffs for the last time we don’t want Maguire back!

 

 

If we let Wes go for less than £10m then it’s an outrage! 

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Nick said:

Christ is this moron still peddling his shite?

 

It's just embarrassing?

They are in for Wes.  79m and 5 year contract.

Posted
1 minute ago, mozartfox said:

They are in for Wes.  79m and 5 year contract.

They should be trying to get Evans back really - would strengthen what they have.

Guest Chocolate Teapot
Posted

Nixon saying its likely we're in for Eduoard.

Posted
10 minutes ago, ALC Fox said:

It's alright, we're getting the newly rejuvenated Chris Smalling in as cover :thumbup:

Maybe it might just be me, and perhaps the pair of them were just worn down and deflated under bobbins management. But the Evans/Smalling pairing wasn't exactly the best defence at United. I'm not keen on a reunion.

Posted
29 minutes ago, Abrasive fox said:

Nixon saying its likely we're in for Eduoard.

Is replying to someone saying he will cost £30m being counted as saying we are in for him? :blink:

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, UniFox21 said:

Is he fairly accurate?

He's good at getting information but his techniques can be a bit questionable :ph34r:

Edited by peach0000
  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Posted
18 minutes ago, AjcW said:

Is replying to someone saying he will cost £30m being counted as saying we are in for him? :blink:

I read those tweets as lazy jounalism tbh. 

 

Someone asked him about incomings at leicester and his response was just saying we need players and  good players cost money, edouard would be one. So it could be read as his opinion about Edouard being a good player. 

 

Then to a follow up question about if we will bid, he said its likely. Again, sounds like guess work 

  • Like 1
Guest Chocolate Teapot
Posted
48 minutes ago, AjcW said:

Is replying to someone saying he will cost £30m being counted as saying we are in for him? :blink:

Hes a bit hit and miss

Posted
52 minutes ago, UniFox21 said:

Is he fairly accurate?

Even a broken Clock is correct twice a day.  

  • Haha 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...