Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, SouthStandUpperTier said:

Please stop peddling this myth, because it's just not true.

 

 

Key Passes (per 90 mins) 2019/20

 

Mendy  0.94

Ndidi    0.30

Hamza  0.30

 

 

Passes into opposition's final third (per 90 mins) 2019/20

 

Mendy  6.88

Ndidi    4.65

Hamza   3.03

 

 

Passes into opposition's penalty area (per 90 mins) 2019/20

 

Mendy  0.31

Hamza  0.20

Ndidi   0.13

 

 

Progressive Passes advancing the ball more than 10 yards towards opposition goal (per 90 mins) 2019/20

 

Mendy  3.44

Ndidi  2.49

Hamza  2.02

Mendy played about 5 games last season.

 

leave it out

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

Sensible move, which i'm surprised anyone is whinging about.

 

He's 5th/6th choice CM. To sign better, you're likely looking at £10m+, which can instead be put towards the areas we desperately need to strengthen, namely out wide. That's not even mentioning the bonus of having a tidy enough player who knows his role is that of a squad player and who therefore won't rock the boat. He clearly seems a popular guy amongst the players.

Edited by martyn
  • Like 3
Posted
6 minutes ago, mod hero said:

Mendy played about 5 games last season.

 

leave it out

Was going to say that’s literally based on him playing V the worst West Ham team I’ve ever seen.

  • Like 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Sampson said:

Wtf? You'd be able to get much better than him for way less than £25mil. Praet is much better than him and came in for £18mil last season.

 

Matty James isn't any worse than him either (although is even more injury prone).

 

He's our 6th choice central midfielder after Tielemans, Maddison, Ndidi, Praet and Choudhury.

 

You'd be better to give one of the youth or development players that role.

 

No doubt he's on decent wages as well given he was our record signing at the time.

 

He's been one of the biggest wastes of money in the club's history.

He's effectively a replacement for Ndidi or Choudhury, the other players you've mentioned are irrelevant. 

 

Ball winning midfielders with stamina are very pricey. Our style works when we have a player constantly winning the ball back. There's no way we could just rely on Ndidi and Hamza all season. Especially given Hamza's disciplinary. In europe he'll be perfect to play that role against lesser sides. 

 

And if you think he's been one of the biggest wastes of money then im guessing you don't remember or weren't around during Peter Taylor and Sven.  

  • Like 1
Posted

Either we go and spend £20m on someone like William Carvalho who would also likely have higher wages or we can save that money and use it towards a position we actually need to spend serious money on

  • Like 3
Posted

Can't complain really. Not the most exciting player around but a reasonable backup option and saves us going out and buying another holding midfielder.

Posted

Pretty sure people are never satisfied 😂. Good deal for both parties, we have cover for a year then can sell on. Also if he doesn’t play much he has the opportunity to leave sooner for first team football if he wants it, rather than on a long Contract which will cost more in a transfer to buy out. 
 

He’s never let us down when he’s played, is a steady premier league player for us to have a a back up plus cup games plus against the weaker sides in Europa. Wilf can’t play every game!

Posted

Just to clarify my overly Statto post earlier. In no way am I suggesting Mendy is better than Wilf, or better than Hamza one day could be. He isn't as good at tackling as those 2 are, isn't as physically imposing, or as athletic. Just wanted to debunk the notion that all he does is pass the ball back or sideways. 

  • Like 1
Posted

3 years. I bet Mendy can't believe his luck being offered that. Decent back up but that's about it. Never gonna be good enough for anything else. 

Posted

Can we all just stop and look at some of the utter shit in the top 8 that is backup midfield players.

 

At Spurs they've got Skipp and Gedson Fernandes, United have got Fred and McTominay, Arsenal have got Willock and Torreira, Wolves have got Gibbs-White.

 

Unless you are Manchester City and have endless money to throw at £30m+ cover players (Cancelo an obvious example), your starting XI is always going to be significantly better than your reserves.

 

Mendy is a steady player and is cheap. His job isn't to take Wilf's place because there's not a player as good as Wilf out there that would come here.

  • Like 2
Posted

Only excited about this, as I really want this chant to take off whenever he plays and we're back in stadiums

 

Woop woop its the sound of Nampalys

Woop woop its the sound of Nampalys

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Blue and white said:

Another new deal for someone who doesn't play.

You’d rather we buy someone else and spend more money on someone who won’t play?

  • Like 1
Posted

Don't think he was ever leaving was he? He just hadn't signed up the new contract yet, was clearly considering his options and who can blame him.

 

Solid, dependable, if unspectacular player and puts a bit of pressure on that DM spot in the side as well as allowing for rotation with a lot of matches to play this year.

 

In truth, as has been said elsewhere, we're getting above ourselves if we think our backup players and arguably 5/6th choice midfielders are going to be much better than Mendy, especially when he's a steady, known entity who has already settled in!

  • Like 1
Posted

He looks average playing alongside Wilf but neither of them are someone to unlock defences.

 

Hes a decent player to call upon if wilf gets injured or closing out the last 20 minutes of a match.

 

If slimani goes is he the last player left from the 2016 summer signings?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...