Brighton (H) - Match Thread

[kingfox]

The boring and negative approach again 

 

Can’t say I’m surprised though, had a feeling he wouldn’t start Thomas, Praet, Barnes and Under as they played a full 90 on Thursday.

 

The only time we should play five at the back is when Ricardo and Castagne are back, with the personnel we currently have it’s bloody shite.

[AjcW]

All to cope with Lamptey.... who isn't in the squad....  

[baldeagle]

1 minute ago, Sharpe's Fox said:

Fully prepared for Maddison mincing about for 90 minutes getting dispossessed.

Shit corners incoming 

Edited 13 December 2020 by baldeagle

[matty98]

How can he not start Under or Barnes after their performances on thursday? It's a joke, we genuinely looked like a decent creative side yet he reverts straight back to this shite?

Fuchs and Albrighton should be cover players and nothing more.

[Crazy Kop Corner]

The problem for me is that the team needs 2 substitutions to make it better. 

[RowlattsFox]

Time to hide from the match thread 

 

As always for me, it depends how the performance goes before commenting.

It was always likely to be this side. 

[Swarles Barkley]

5 at the back to cope with Lamptey

 

 

 

 

 

 

who isnt playing

[Dan]

Yeah once again that just doesn't fill me with confidence. Lacks width and lacks pace. I've a bad feeling we're about to see Fulham all over again.

[CloudFox]

2 minutes ago, Mark said:

“He’s only playing a back 5 until Ndidi is back” 🙄

Yeah okay I was very much in that camp, apologies. Not sure why he's doing this other than to try and counter attack them.

[Livid]

Nobody panic, he’s done it again! 

[foxfanazer]

Stop me if you think that you've heard this one before 

[ronnup]

Disappointing 

[Guest Manini]

Disappointed. But not surprised. Come on you boys in blue get it done. 

[Dahnsouff]

2 minutes ago, Mark said:

“He’s only playing a back 5 until Ndidi is back” 🙄

It’s true, now that Wilf is back, it’s a back six 

[Steve_Guppy_Left_Foot]

You get that sinking feeling with that line up, the only saving grace is hopefully Brighton won't be content just sitting off, if they do we all know deep down how this game is going to pan out, there's a quite simple method to defeating us playing that system, our main hope is perez has some spark. 

[Matt]

Did Rodgers not learn or take anything out of Thursday?

 

FFS.

[Jimothy]

2 minutes ago, Lambert09 said:

I don’t agree with the line up, but it’s good enough to get the job done. Cmon boys! 

Like it was good enough against Fulham, Villa, West ham, very nearly came unstuck against Sheff Utd. Got hammered at an injury ravaged Liverpool. Its clearly not good enough.

[StanSP]

1 minute ago, Mark said:

He’s not playing

Oh that's good. Not in the squad at all?

[Brooksy]

Its gonna be a terrible watch.

[whoareyaaa]

1 minute ago, matty98 said:

How can he not start Under or Barnes after their performances on thursday? It's a joke, we genuinely looked like a decent creative side yet he reverts straight back to this shite?

Fuchs and Albrighton should be cover players and nothing more.

come on mate they are young lads they can't manage two games in a week

[nnfox]

Genius.

[Ric Flair]

4 minutes ago, Mark said:

“He’s only playing a back 5 until Ndidi is back” 🙄

Fuming, just ridiculous. Also no Thomas on the bench so that means we have to put up with Fuchs there if we need to change it. 

[Beechey]

Not the system I’d have wanted, but having Ndidi back might hopefully give us more presence in midfield, something I think we’ve struggled with recently

[rachhere]

At least we get to see Perez in a central role with Vards? 

[Grebfromgrebland]

4 minutes ago, JamesfromlondonLCFC said:

FIVE AT THE BACK WHY

WITH NDIDI ITS ACTUALLY 6 AT THE BACK