Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Iheanacho + perez can be a good combination at times. Has a huge potential to blow up in our faces but i wont be overly mad at rodgers. Under probably not going to get a fair chance to prove himself here though sadly.

Posted

is there a rational argument as to why Iheanacho and Perez keep on starting instead of Under ? If you won't give him a run against the likes of Leeds or Fulham you might aswell send him back to Roma...

Posted
Just now, Sunbury Fox said:

Mendy was poor the other day so no problem with Hamza having a go.

 

But don't start me on the subject of Perez being started again - on the right wing! :nigel:

 

Ünder might as well go back to Roma.:(

Don’t think Ayoze is on the wing, more narrow maybe

Posted

Maddison needs to take this game by the scruff of its neck and impose himself on it. About time he found some consistency. And if his first corner doesn’t beat the first man, he wants taking off them. 

  • Haha 1
Posted

Under is pony give it a rest. If we want a one footed pace merchant that blasts the ball into row z every time he gets the ball we should’ve kept Gray

  • Like 3
Posted
7 minutes ago, StanSP said:

 

Seems Brendan took my FT suggestion of Perez and Nacho, instead of either.  lol

 

Now, let's just hope that both of them and Madders don't all crowd up together in the traditional '10' position. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Ric Flair said:

Ünder must be pissing himself at this. Fair enough whilst Albrighton was playing champagne football but if Ayoze Perez is getting in ahead of you when he's not had a decent game on the wing for about a year on the back of a heinous display up front the last 2 games and you know what the manager must think of you.

 

Pack your bags Cengiz, unbelievable.

Come on, do not think Perez is in the wing tbh, more of a fluid 3 behind Kel?

  • Like 1
Posted

On the Under vs. Perez thing - I don't doubt that it's a loan vs. 30M investment at play a bit. Either way I think we'll see that pair swap at some point, the question is if it's at half, 60 minutes or 75-80?

  • Like 1
Posted

I think Rodgers specifically wants the right side to be narrower, Albrighton hasn't been as wide as usual this season either. Only excuse I can make for not preferring Under as plan A.

Posted

This is what I like. Attacking front 3 or 4.

Just a shame Tielemans looks to be in a more of a defensive role.

Posted
1 minute ago, TJB-fox said:

Under is pony give it a rest. If we want a one footed pace merchant that blasts the ball into row z every time he gets the ball we should’ve kept Gray

Lol. Under has shown more in his cameos than Gray has in his entire Leicester career. What a bad take

  • Like 2
Posted

Early prediction for a Hamza red and a FT meltdown. 

 

I wonder if Under has been left on the bench today because he is the only impact player we have available right now if things are going badly?

 

I think he starts this if we had more players available.

 

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...