Guest Chocolate Teapot Posted 20 May 2021 Posted 20 May 2021 Just now, turlo said: is that down to our interest cooling or his? i assume Atlanta are pushing for a much higher price than originally reported Atlanta having an extra year option largely meaning he'll cost far more than we thought.
Sunbury Fox Posted 22 May 2021 Posted 22 May 2021 He's a great player but I would rather us spend money elsewhere, given that cash is likely to be quite tight. I think that we should wait to see what Justin is like when he returns to the team before deciding to splurge cash on another left back. Before his injury Justin was looking so good - and we have decent back up in this position with Thomas and Timmy.
TrentFox Posted 22 May 2021 Posted 22 May 2021 1 minute ago, Sunbury Fox said: He's a great player but I would rather us spend money elsewhere, given that cash is likely to be quite tight. I think that we should wait to see what Justin is like when he returns to the team before deciding to splurge cash on another left back. Before his injury Justin was looking so good - and we have decent back up in this position with Thomas and Timmy. Which is why Bertrand makes such good sense. He gets us through 12 months whilst JJ and Ricky get back up to speed. 🤞 1
Pliskin Posted 23 May 2021 Posted 23 May 2021 The lucrative new deal we’ve signed make these deals financially viable without the CL.
The People's Hero Posted 23 May 2021 Posted 23 May 2021 On 20/05/2021 at 11:54, Chocolate Teapot said: Atlanta having an extra year option largely meaning he'll cost far more than we thought. We do keep contact and tabs though; so might be one for next year maybe? We'll just have to wait and see.
Jimmy Lad Posted 23 May 2021 Posted 23 May 2021 4 minutes ago, Pliskin said: The lucrative new deal we’ve signed make these deals financially viable without the CL. How? We lost £60m last season even with selling Maguire. Where’s the extra £100m coming from?
Pliskin Posted 23 May 2021 Posted 23 May 2021 1 minute ago, Jimmy Lad said: How? We lost £60m last season even with selling Maguire. Where’s the extra £100m coming from? Lost £60m? We never had the CL money...... you get it when you qualify so we haven’t lost anything. The deal is a huge deal which offers up a significant amount of investment..... the club have been working hard to creat new bonds with new stakeholders which will help to increase the clubs financial position.
FoxinNotts Posted 23 May 2021 Posted 23 May 2021 As long as any debt is serviceable, it isn’t a problem. Our current debt looks very manageable, in terms of the global profile our club is now receiving. I reckon we’re in a great position, relative to the type and level of player we want to attract and the likes of Gosens seems attainable.
Jimmy Lad Posted 23 May 2021 Posted 23 May 2021 40 minutes ago, Pliskin said: Lost £60m? We never had the CL money...... you get it when you qualify so we haven’t lost anything. The deal is a huge deal which offers up a significant amount of investment..... the club have been working hard to creat new bonds with new stakeholders which will help to increase the clubs financial position. Agree. But to say we are now financially strong is wrong in my opinion. We needed more than a shirt sponsorship to balance the books.. yes, it’s a great deal but add the £60 from the CL to that and then we would be in a position to dictate things.
Pliskin Posted 23 May 2021 Posted 23 May 2021 9 minutes ago, Jimmy Lad said: Agree. But to say we are now financially strong is wrong in my opinion. We needed more than a shirt sponsorship to balance the books.. yes, it’s a great deal but add the £60 from the CL to that and then we would be in a position to dictate things. There’s nothing wrong with our finances?? We’re the best ran club in the league... we’ve already pretty much sorted two signings, and we have others in the pipelines we’re also negotiating a new deal for Youri, we’re in a strong financial position. We have a ceiling of course we do because we’re self sufficient, but there is a reason King Power was built from the ground up to become what it is today. The people at the very top are savvy business people, we also have an excellent chief executive officer in Susan Whelan who along with KP has been working hard to secure major relationship with key stakeholders. You don’t need to lose sleep over finances, we’re fine, and we can afford more than you think, it’s still a modest budget, but it’s one that will enable us to compete. 2
Kierzz Posted 23 May 2021 Posted 23 May 2021 3 hours ago, Pliskin said: Lost £60m? We never had the CL money...... you get it when you qualify so we haven’t lost anything. The deal is a huge deal which offers up a significant amount of investment..... the club have been working hard to creat new bonds with new stakeholders which will help to increase the clubs financial position. Has anywhere quoted how much the sponsorship deal is worth?
Beechey Posted 23 May 2021 Posted 23 May 2021 10 minutes ago, Kierzz said: Has anywhere quoted how much the sponsorship deal is worth? No specifics yet, but I've seen journalists say it's "lucrative". Could be anything, really. Everton's is worth about £10m per year I think.
turlo Posted 23 May 2021 Posted 23 May 2021 2 hours ago, Jimmy Lad said: Agree. But to say we are now financially strong is wrong in my opinion. We needed more than a shirt sponsorship to balance the books.. yes, it’s a great deal but add the £60 from the CL to that and then we would be in a position to dictate things. We'd get no where near 60 mill for qualifying for the UCL unless we make it into the latter rounds. a proportion of the payout is now based on coefficient which we wouldn't score highly in 1
Fox 4 Life Posted 24 May 2021 Posted 24 May 2021 1 hour ago, dayday said: What’s happened? He wanted champions league, this will be a common theme now, including some of our own players.
Pliskin Posted 24 May 2021 Posted 24 May 2021 6 hours ago, Kierzz said: Has anywhere quoted how much the sponsorship deal is worth? Around £50-£60m a year is what I’ve been told.....
majaco Posted 24 May 2021 Posted 24 May 2021 1 hour ago, Pliskin said: Around £50-£60m a year is what I’ve been told..... If you are right, that is lucrative
dayday Posted 24 May 2021 Posted 24 May 2021 8 minutes ago, majaco said: If you are right, that is lucrative That’s a bloody good deal, what was KP paying?
snoopy87 Posted 24 May 2021 Posted 24 May 2021 4 minutes ago, dayday said: That’s a bloody good deal, what was KP paying? 4!
st albans fox Posted 24 May 2021 Posted 24 May 2021 2 hours ago, Pliskin said: Around £50-£60m a year is what I’ve been told..... that will attract some serious investigation from some journos would be the second highest deal in the prem
OllieLodge96 Posted 24 May 2021 Posted 24 May 2021 10 hours ago, Kierzz said: Has anywhere quoted how much the sponsorship deal is worth? Read on Twitter yesterday that it was £30m
SecretPro Posted 24 May 2021 Posted 24 May 2021 1 hour ago, OllieLodge96 said: Read on Twitter yesterday that it was £30m Per season 1
MPH Posted 24 May 2021 Posted 24 May 2021 17 hours ago, Pliskin said: The lucrative new deal we’ve signed make these deals financially viable without the CL. It’s an interesting development. Were King power not paying for the shirt sponsorship? Was it a perk of owning the club? If they were paying I don’t imagine we are like getting triple the amount nor or anything from the new company.. unless we have found a way for King power to sponsor something else which would be totally legit and above board so that we get both sponsorship incomes..
Recommended Posts