Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
bovril

Unpopular Opinions You Hold

By bovril, in General Chat

Recommended Posts

Izzy

Izzy

Posted
Posted

Tyson Fury will sadly never get his shit together and won’t box professionally again 

  • Like 1
Wymsey

Wymsey

Posted
Posted (edited)

Footballers, in particular, should contribute some of their earnings to charity - as money shouldn't be everything to a person or define how successful they are.

Edited by Wymeswold fox
Miquel The Work Geordie

Miquel The Work Geordie

Posted
Posted
On 04/11/2017 at 11:17, lifted*fox said:

Most British comedy is shit - especially the stuff that gets turned out on channels like ITV, BBC, 4, etc. 

 

People that enjoy stuff like Miranda, Mrs. Brown's Boys, etc. need to check themselves - that shit ain't funny, at all. 

 

Also, northern comedians like Peter Kay and friends - not funny, at all. Making stereotypical jokes about ****ing fish and chips and other northern shit. NO. Comedy for idiots. 

 

Ricky Gervais - not funny. Lee Evans - not funny. Michael McIntyre - not funny. 

 

All cheap comedians who rely on obvious gags or shit slapstick guff for cheap laughs. 

 

I see people getting hyped for that shit and I'm like - really?

 

That other guy who literally just tries to be as outrageous as possible, urm... can't remember his name but no, not funny. 

 

American comedians are significantly better - they rely on cynicism and a lot of the humour is a lot more intelligent, well thought out, dark. That rolls into American sit-com as well - much better shows, Always Sunny, Bojack, Arrested Development, Curb Your Enthusiasm, Nathan For You, Broad City, etc. 

 

Not many UK comedians I'll make time for tbh - Russell Brand is an exception. 

 

Only UK comedy TV that's been on form recently has been People Just Do Nothing but the heady days of stuff like Peep Show, IT Crowd, etc. are long gone. I just don't think there's enough clever comedy writers in the UK who are prepared to make intelligent, challenging comedy. 

 

America has it's share of bland, broad comedy as well as we do.

 

Catastrophe, Fleabag, Lovesick, Him & Her and Uncle are all great shows we've produced recently.

 

Although it missed the mark a lot, BBC 3 going online has shut the door for a lot of writers which is a shame because every now and then it'd produce an absolute gem.

  • Like 3
Samilktray

Samilktray

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Miquel The Work Geordie said:

 

America has it's share of bland, broad comedy as well as we do.

 

Catastrophe, Fleabag, Lovesick, Him & Her and Uncle are all great shows we've produced recently.

 

Although it missed the mark a lot, BBC 3 going online has shut the door for a lot of writers which is a shame because every now and then it'd produce an absolute gem.

I forgot about Him & Her, great show 

Milo

Milo

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Wymeswold fox said:

Footballers, in particular, should contribute some of their earnings to charity - as money shouldn't be everything to a person or define how successful they are.

Not sure that's an unpopular opinion, tbh (certainly more popular than some recent opinions, anyway :P)

 

Absolutely agree with the first bit, and I know most players do something charity-wise. Juan Mata showing the way http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/40831430

 

Happiness over money every day for me 

  • Like 1
Swarles Barkley

Swarles Barkley

Posted
Posted

I have no qualms about footballers missing international football to be fit for their club side. It amazes me how many people are upset about kane, allie etc missing these meaningless friendlies. Guaranteed they wouldn't give a shit if one of their own players missed the games

 

Tielemans63

Tielemans63

Posted
Posted (edited)

I know this is morally reprehensible and utterly shameful but.....

 

 

......I actually don't mind Spurs.

 

Forgive me.

Edited by Paddy.
Countryfox

Countryfox

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, Paddy. said:

I know this is morally reprehensible and utterly shameful but.....

 

 

......I actually don't mind Spurs.

 

Forgive me.

 

Are you MADDD !!!!! ....   :o

SpacedX

SpacedX

Posted
Posted (edited)
47 minutes ago, Paddy. said:

I know this is morally reprehensible and utterly shameful but.....

 

 

......I actually don't mind Spurs.

 

Forgive me.

In the 44 contentious and divisive pages of this thread this is by far the most sickening, disturbed and depraved confession. Get help.

Edited by Line-X
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
SystonFox

SystonFox

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Wymeswold fox said:

Footballers, in particular, should contribute some of their earnings to charity - as money shouldn't be everything to a person or define how successful they are.

How do we know they don’t?!?!

Jimothy

Jimothy

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Wymeswold fox said:

Footballers, in particular, should contribute some of their earnings to charity - as money shouldn't be everything to a person or define how successful they are.

 

28 minutes ago, SystonFox said:

How do we know they don’t?!?!

And why footballers inparticular and not film stars, bankers, CEO's etc. There's plenty out there who earn obscene amounts, so why footballer inparticular?

Edited by Facecloth
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Paddy. said:

I know this is morally reprehensible and utterly shameful but.....

 

 

......I actually don't mind Spurs.

 

Forgive me.

I agree. I wasn't a fan *that* season but I rather like what potch had done with their team.

It's Arsenal I can't stand due to their willy puller  fans.

The Doctor

The Doctor

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, toddybad said:

I agree. I wasn't a fan *that* season but I rather like what potch had done with their team.

It's Arsenal I can't stand due to their willy puller  fans.

Arsenals online fan base are a bunch of melts granted, but tbf so are Spurs.

leicsmac

leicsmac

Posted
Posted
Just now, The Doctor said:

Arsenals online fan base are a bunch of melts granted, but tbf so are Spurs.

It's difficult to say who are worse, but if you had me choose at gunpoint I'd have to say Arsenals.

Jon the Hat

Jon the Hat

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Wymeswold fox said:

Footballers, in particular, should contribute some of their earnings to charity - as money shouldn't be everything to a person or define how successful they are.

Morally yes of course, but they should not be obliged.  The MASSIVE amounts of tax they contribute to the Treasury are more than enough obligation.

Rogstanley

Rogstanley

Posted
Posted (edited)

I like spurs too. It’s a squad that has been built mostly the old fashioned way with modest outlay and development of youth, and they play good football. Kane is fast developing into a top tier player as well and that’s a story of hard work and perseverance. There’s not a lot to dislike about them to be honest. Our rivalry with them is over and we won, so there’s no bitterness there from me, only good memories. 

Edited by Rogstanley
  • Like 1
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Dr The Singh said:

I like Nottingham Forest

Mods. Ban him.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...