Collymore Posted 23 December 2018 Posted 23 December 2018 13 minutes ago, WarehamFox said: I'm confused, did they shake hands?
Trav Le Bleu Posted 26 December 2018 Posted 26 December 2018 Surely the running order will be Liverpool, then us? Slight case for spuds 2nd (more goals) but builds the narrative better with us 2nd. There's even an argument for us on first.
Master Fox Posted 26 December 2018 Posted 26 December 2018 Robbie Earle on NBC predicted we’d lose 1-4 today. Then he just said Tottenham won the league in 2016. What an utter cretin he is.
don_danbury Posted 26 December 2018 Posted 26 December 2018 5 minutes ago, Master Fox said: Robbie Earle on NBC predicted we’d lose 1-4 today. Then he just said Tottenham won the league in 2016. What an utter cretin he is. 5000/1 to win the league. i wouldn't put a dollar on that.
jayfox26 Posted 26 December 2018 Posted 26 December 2018 Pep talking shit. "They created more than palace but didn't create much". Well palace banged 3 past you pal so if we created more than that then we did ok! Hammered them last 10 of first half and should have been 3 up at the break. They had all the ball as expected but created little and I don't remember schmeichel making any meaningful saves. Just a few long rangers straight at him. Ederson made 3 good saves off Choudhury, madders and Vardy. I might be biased but i think we deserved that. No good having all the possession like city did if you do nothing with it. Great effort from the boys today!
baldeagle Posted 26 December 2018 Posted 26 December 2018 Pundits still no clue apparently we originally set up as 4-5-1 ? then changed once Maddison got the note
GeorgeTheFox Posted 26 December 2018 Posted 26 December 2018 Analysis from Murphy was pretty much spot on for once! Didn't feel like the highlights reflected the flow of the game though
Gamble92 Posted 26 December 2018 Posted 26 December 2018 10 minutes ago, jayfox26 said: Pep talking shit. "They created more than palace but didn't create much". Well palace banged 3 past you pal so if we created more than that then we did ok! Hammered them last 10 of first half and should have been 3 up at the break. They had all the ball as expected but created little and I don't remember schmeichel making any meaningful saves. Just a few long rangers straight at him. Ederson made 3 good saves off Choudhury, madders and Vardy. I might be biased but i think we deserved that. No good having all the possession like city did if you do nothing with it. Great effort from the boys today! Doesnt get mentioned much but he is such a sore loser. Probably not mentioned much because they hardly ever lose!
Mehrez Posted 26 December 2018 Posted 26 December 2018 Must have changed the format, quite enjoyed the last couple - used to dread it
Gamble92 Posted 26 December 2018 Posted 26 December 2018 3 minutes ago, GeorgeTheFox said: Analysis from Murphy was pretty much spot on for once! Didn't feel like the highlights reflected the flow of the game though was just nice to see him doing an analysis on us without naming where all our best players should go in January.
Finnegan Posted 26 December 2018 Posted 26 December 2018 Have I accidentally squashed the resolution on my telly or has Shaqiri's diet rubbed off on Bobby Firmino over Crimbo?
Finnegan Posted 26 December 2018 Posted 26 December 2018 1 minute ago, Kasey Keller said: Salah dive feck me Yeah I was going to mention that. Pretty shameful. He obviously touches his arm but **** off is that enough to slow him let alone bring him down.
Brainy Posted 26 December 2018 Posted 26 December 2018 10 minutes ago, GeorgeTheFox said: Analysis from Murphy was pretty much spot on for once! Didn't feel like the highlights reflected the flow of the game though Understandably sore losers are those who don't lose much
StanSP Posted 26 December 2018 Posted 26 December 2018 1 minute ago, Walkers said: Understandably sore losers are those who don't lose much Mark Hughes and Sean Dyche are sore losers and they lose a lot!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.