Ayoze Pérez

[volpeazzurro]

15 minutes ago, peterborofox said:

Would like to see him in the two up front in a 352 formation. 

 

But not interested in him playing on the wing. The guy offers nothing. Absolutely anonymous

Partly agree if really needed because of injury but, would you want him there instead of Vardy and Iheanacho?

[fuchsntf]

I always give a player..a season..!!!

[BigGibbo]

Not a winger for me. Would like to see more of him alongside or behind Vardy/Iheanacho though.

[Stadt]

He’s not a winger but he’s not good enough to change the system up to play to his strengths either.

[ithuriel]

Not consistent, the odd good game is just not enough at this level.

[volpeazzurro]

A waste of space and his continued selection for me casts doubt on Rodgers reasons and motivation to do so. 

[Always Next Year]

18 minutes ago, volpeazzurro said:

A waste of space and his continued selection for me casts doubt on Rodgers reasons and motivation to do so. 

Agree with you 110% a waste of money.

[splinterdream]

Not a winger, more of a striker for me, would have been good if we'd have put him central with nacho with Albrighton on the wing in a 442, his close control in the box is pretty good

[Marshall Cockney Fox]

He's very frustrating. His abilities can not be maximised out wide. In fact his fragilities are more exposed. Just stop in Brendan. Down the middle or not at all.

[Charl91]

Doesn't fit with our system.

 

Certainly not a winger - not pacey enough, gets pushed off the ball and goes down too easily. Nice control inside the box, but rarely actually touches the ball in the box.

[Pliskin]

1 hour ago, volpeazzurro said:

A waste of space and his continued selection for me casts doubt on Rodgers reasons and motivation to do so. 

Who replaces him though? Gray is shite and Albrighton doesn’t fit Rodgers system? 

[mod hero]

1 hour ago, fuchsntf said:

I always give a player..a season..!!!

More exclamation marks in your posts from now on please

[Fox92]

Doesn't suit us. Not a winger.

 

Good footballer and I think his one two's with Ricardo are good but play him centrally ffs.

[murphy]

Perhaps Maddison needs a kick up the backside.  Drop him for Villa and try Perez in his role.

[volpeazzurro]

1 hour ago, Pliskin said:

Who replaces him though? Gray is shite and Albrighton doesn’t fit Rodgers system? 

What system? None of them fit it at the moment 12 points out of 12 games would suggest. Albrighton would at least stay on his feet, work hard and put crosses into the box. The fact that nobody is in the box is more about the inadequacy of our forward play. I think Iheanacho would benefit from him. Whatever Gray is or isn't, he's not been given the opportunities Perez has had and he certainly couldn't don't any worse.

[Pliskin]

27 minutes ago, volpeazzurro said:

What system? None of them fit it at the moment 12 points out of 12 games would suggest. Albrighton would at least stay on his feet, work hard and put crosses into the box. The fact that nobody is in the box is more about the inadequacy of our forward play. I think Iheanacho would benefit from him. Whatever Gray is or isn't, he's not been given the opportunities Perez has had and he certainly couldn't don't any worse.

Gray has been given ample playing time to produce something. He’s as useful as a wank stain on black trousers. There is a system, but we have too many underperforming players who are integral to that style which means things aren’t working, replacing them with other players who also don’t complement our style won’t help either. What we need is a couple of wins the break the dip.

[shade]

congertons protection?

[volpeazzurro]

4 minutes ago, Pliskin said:

Gray has been given ample playing time to produce something. He’s as useful as a wank stain on black trousers. There is a system, but we have too many underperforming players who are integral to that style which means things aren’t working, replacing them with other players who also don’t complement our style won’t help either. What we need is a couple of wins the break the dip.

What we really need is a specialist on the right and not another mediocre squad filler utility player like Perez. 

[inckley fox]

Another 'pretty' player. Lightweight, inconsistent, not especially quick, doesn't involve himself in games... might be a 10 or a striker, who knows, but there's no point playing him on the wing, or as a 'wide attacker', if you like. When I saw the team sheet I said 'Perez? Wow, we're screwed.'

 

I've not been especially impressed with Marc since Rodgers turned up, but we know full well that he's a competent winger, and at very least adds physicality, energy, and proper protection for full backs (one of the principal reasons for our loss yesterday). Perez, in that role, is a 1 in 6 player. Like Chilwell on the left, he's costing us points and you didn't need to be an expert to see that he needed taking out of the side some time back.

[Pliskin]

19 minutes ago, volpeazzurro said:

What we really need is a specialist on the right and not another mediocre squad filler utility player like Perez. 

I agree, we need to go for two out and out wingers in the summer, ideally, but I guess we will see!

[foxinsocks]

Perez needs 6mths gym work so he sorts out his upper body strength so he isn't shoved off the ball.  Then he will he a good player 

[Mickyblueeyes]

Not a very good player. I realised a few games ago each time he gets the Ball subconsciously I sigh thinking an attack has broken down. For £30 million, he offers very little. Unfortunately, I think he is the best of a bad bunch (for our ambitions) in a problem area. 

[Dan]

He's not good enough. I've seen enough. His bad games outweigh his good quite significantly. Poor signing.

[fuchsntf]

4 hours ago, mod hero said:

More exclamation marks in your posts from now on please

Tut.tut..!!!! (4)

[fleckneymike]

The weakest player to have ever taken to a football field. I've never seen a player so easily brushed off the ball. Heck, half the time he isn't even brushed off the ball he just falls over at the thought of a challenge.