Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
That_Dude

Ayoze Pérez

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, peterborofox said:

Would like to see him in the two up front in a 352 formation. 

 

But not interested in him playing on the wing. The guy offers nothing. Absolutely anonymous

Partly agree if really needed because of injury but, would you want him there instead of Vardy and Iheanacho?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pliskin said:

Who replaces him though? Gray is shite and Albrighton doesn’t fit Rodgers system? 

What system? None of them fit it at the moment 12 points out of 12 games would suggest. Albrighton would at least stay on his feet, work hard and put crosses into the box. The fact that nobody is in the box is more about the inadequacy of our forward play. I think Iheanacho would benefit from him. Whatever Gray is or isn't, he's not been given the opportunities Perez has had and he certainly couldn't don't any worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, volpeazzurro said:

What system? None of them fit it at the moment 12 points out of 12 games would suggest. Albrighton would at least stay on his feet, work hard and put crosses into the box. The fact that nobody is in the box is more about the inadequacy of our forward play. I think Iheanacho would benefit from him. Whatever Gray is or isn't, he's not been given the opportunities Perez has had and he certainly couldn't don't any worse.

Gray has been given ample playing time to produce something. He’s as useful as a wank stain on black trousers. There is a system, but we have too many underperforming players who are integral to that style which means things aren’t working, replacing them with other players who also don’t complement our style won’t help either. What we need is a couple of wins the break the dip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Pliskin said:

Gray has been given ample playing time to produce something. He’s as useful as a wank stain on black trousers. There is a system, but we have too many underperforming players who are integral to that style which means things aren’t working, replacing them with other players who also don’t complement our style won’t help either. What we need is a couple of wins the break the dip.

What we really need is a specialist on the right and not another mediocre squad filler utility player like Perez. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another 'pretty' player. Lightweight, inconsistent, not especially quick, doesn't involve himself in games... might be a 10 or a striker, who knows, but there's no point playing him on the wing, or as a 'wide attacker', if you like. When I saw the team sheet I said 'Perez? Wow, we're screwed.'

 

I've not been especially impressed with Marc since Rodgers turned up, but we know full well that he's a competent winger, and at very least adds physicality, energy, and proper protection for full backs (one of the principal reasons for our loss yesterday). Perez, in that role, is a 1 in 6 player. Like Chilwell on the left, he's costing us points and you didn't need to be an expert to see that he needed taking out of the side some time back.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...