Foxxed Posted 9 January 2020 Posted 9 January 2020 2 hours ago, dayday said: Looks like Maddison is out injured Barnes as the number 10. It could be electric.
Foxxed Posted 9 January 2020 Posted 9 January 2020 1 hour ago, SystonFox said: 0-2 to them. Both goals in the last 5 mins. Mass exodus and boos all around for a team sat 2nd in the league. entitled cockwombles Sounds like you’re all geared up for this. The patient pass-pass-pass probe pass-pass-pass can become tiring but at least we can entertain ourselves by a bit of fellow fan baiting.
Stadt Posted 9 January 2020 Posted 9 January 2020 We need width, a diamond plays into their hands. Kasper Ricardo Evans Soyuncu Chilwell Choudhury Perez Praet Maddison Barnes Vardy
st albans fox Posted 9 January 2020 Posted 9 January 2020 35 minutes ago, Foxxed said: Barnes as the number 10. It could be electric. If madders is out then Pérez will play that role I would think ....
Gazza M Posted 9 January 2020 Posted 9 January 2020 With one or two injuries I would like to see: Kasper Ricardo Evans Soyuncu Chilwell Choudhury Albrighton Perez Tielemans Barnes Vardy Subs: Ward, Justin, Benkovic, Praet, Gray, Mendy, Iheanacho
gw_leics772 Posted 9 January 2020 Posted 9 January 2020 On 08/01/2020 at 22:41, Devonfox1884 said: Genuinely tempted to drop Chilwell for a game. I am genuinely tempted to sack solskjaer(sp?) Unfortunately, as I suspect is the case with you, I have no power to make it happen. (unless that's you brendan, in which case, feel free)
Deeg67 Posted 9 January 2020 Posted 9 January 2020 Had a feeling when Madders stayed down as long as he did he had a concussion. Under normal circumstances he would have dragged himself upright and kept the game moving, given how much that stoppage helped Villa. This will be a real test, no question. I would imagine Perez slides into the #10 role here.
Lesta2014 Posted 9 January 2020 Posted 9 January 2020 5 hours ago, Dahnsouff said: Anyone got any idea of the extent of Maddison’s injury? https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/james-maddison-injury-how-leicester-3722767 Thought he looked a bit groggy after that bang to the head at the end? Maybe concussion fears? I know mercury says he limped off but I didn’t notice it??
Blue-fox Posted 9 January 2020 Posted 9 January 2020 Really short in midfield if Maddison and ndidi are out. Especially with youris form.
TJB-fox Posted 9 January 2020 Posted 9 January 2020 9 minutes ago, Blue-fox said: Really short in midfield if Maddison and ndidi are out. Especially with youris form. Great opportunity for Hamza and Praet to stake a claim.
gw_leics772 Posted 9 January 2020 Posted 9 January 2020 On 08/01/2020 at 22:45, twister said: I would make changes for this lot its worked in previous weeks so why not again. If they play like they did at Villa Park a few weeks back they are a serious danger, so two tought tackling players in the middle might be in order Kasper Ricardo Evans Soyuncu Chilwell Albrighton Hamza Youri Gray Barnes Kelechi Keeping Chilwell in only because Fuchs cant play two games in three or four days against a hard pressing team, concerned how weary Maddison looked at the end there so giving him a rest , see if Barnes can find some form against a team he played well against earlier in the season. Vardy and his wife have had their baby arrive and I might be willing to give him another rest to have him sharper later in the season, a big risk but might pay off with a full weeks training next week. One or two players look like they have given a huge amount first half of the season so legs will be have to be managed in coming weeks. A well reasoned and thought out post. I agree e that mixing it up isn't a bad idea, which means it could be almost any formation atm but sticking with your choice I'd make a few changes. I don't know where I stood with maddison and hopefully your observations were a result of what brendan has just told us about him being Injured. I would have played him otherwise but probably mostly because I thought they were all just shit last night so didn't notice anything specific with him. After villa I'd be tempted to try fuchs anyway and risk it, or even Justin (but I've made my thoughts perfectly clear in the Chilwell thread so ill leave it at that here) My main difference of opinion is that I think vardy has had a longer break than he has had for a long time and needs to be played Into form now imo, and with our "favourable" run of fixtures we should have enough to see us through and have him back on it in time for the tougher games. Kelechi seems the obvious choice up front alongside him with his current form but as above, with our run of fixtures (very likely over optimistic as we haven't been all that since Norwich) I don't see him as the future even in his good form so would like to give Barnes or gray a chance with 2 up top and alongside vardy, and the other on the wing. Having said that I would love us to play 2 up top as our main formation and as long as vardy is one of them, think any one of perez, gray, Barnes and Kelechi could do a job and wouldnt be unhappy with any of them. Kelechi does seem the obvious choice in the short term if we went that way but my choice is obviously tainted by my overriding belief that Kelechi is not the future, no matter how much we want him to be.
gw_leics772 Posted 9 January 2020 Posted 9 January 2020 23 hours ago, foxfanazer said: Just had the weirdest dream that we were 2nd in the league and in the semi final of the cup. Came on here though and soon realised all of our players are shit and we're in fact in a relegation dogfight I honestly think it's a superstition for some that genuinely think of they are optimistic (or dare I say even justifiably confident) then they have jinxed us and it will be all their fault if we lose. There's no easy games in the Premier league, except those that were obviously easy games (and in the premier league)
themightyfin Posted 10 January 2020 Posted 10 January 2020 Maddison injury will not rule him out. Hes fine.
Guest Danny Clender Posted 10 January 2020 Posted 10 January 2020 I'm really enjoying all this squad rotation, makes the team announcement box office. 100% agree Southampton are coming for us in this game, I still feel we've got enough to take them though. After Brendan's admission of his selection error on wednesday, I'm sure he's been up early working on this game. I'd also go, Schmeichel DEFAULT Perez Choudhury Maddison Barnes Iheanacho Vardy totally 4-4-2'em
Livid Posted 10 January 2020 Posted 10 January 2020 They will obviously be up for this one. Primarily I want us to win but it seems like ages since we had a performance at home to match some of those I've seen away.
st albans fox Posted 10 January 2020 Posted 10 January 2020 4 hours ago, themightyfin said: Maddison injury will not rule him out. Hes fine. Don’t tell em your name pike !!! there was a time when Nigel would keep this going till 2pm Saturday ......
CloudFox Posted 10 January 2020 Posted 10 January 2020 Wary of this game, but if we're on it we can do this. I'd go for... Schmeichel Ricardo Evans Soyuncu Chilwell Choudhury Tielemans Maddison Perez Vardy Barnes Tough to leave Nacho out of the starting line up, but we need to get back to this formation to find some consistency. Nacho to come on at 60' and bag another too 😉
Devonfox1884 Posted 10 January 2020 Posted 10 January 2020 9 hours ago, gw_leics772 said: I am genuinely tempted to sack solskjaer(sp?) Unfortunately, as I suspect is the case with you, I have no power to make it happen. (unless that's you brendan, in which case, feel free) If I was Brendan then we’d more likely be headed for relegation than champions league... hence why I now expect Chilwell to start and score on Saturday
Guest Posted 10 January 2020 Posted 10 January 2020 11 hours ago, StanSP said: Interesting take. Chelsea have lost at home to West Ham, Bournemouth & Southampton. Should they not be challenging for a competition they're already in? Tottenham have lost at home to Newcastle, drew with Watford, lost away to the side we beat 9-0...should they have no right to challenge for CL? Man City lost at Norwich and drew with Newcastle away. Do they have no right to challenge? By your logic, only Liverpool have the right to challenge for a CL place because they pretty much beat anybody. Stan, you're an intelligent guy and you know how to read. So from your own admission Liverpool and Man city haven't lost to poor teams at home. Those are the teams we are comparing ourselves with this season as we sit in second and look for a CL spot, they have 2 of the 4 spots and we are fighting for the last 2. It surprises me that a team as weak as Spurs have only lost at home to Newcastle, hopefully the loss of Kane can remove them from the equation. If we want top 4 we HAVE to beat the mid table and poor teams when we are playing at home - especially when we aren't doing so well against the elite clubs. If we can't beat these teams at home, logic dictates that we can't beat these teams away from and we can't beat better teams at home or away. The inabaility to beat them means we would end up in the lower reaches of the division. I didn't state that we will beat them, I stated that we should and must if we wish to compete for CL. It would be very easy to drop away from the top 4.
StanSP Posted 10 January 2020 Posted 10 January 2020 28 minutes ago, FIF said: Stan, you're an intelligent guy and you know how to read. So from your own admission Liverpool and Man city haven't lost to poor teams at home. Those are the teams we are comparing ourselves with this season as we sit in second and look for a CL spot, they have 2 of the 4 spots and we are fighting for the last 2. It surprises me that a team as weak as Spurs have only lost at home to Newcastle, hopefully the loss of Kane can remove them from the equation. If we want top 4 we HAVE to beat the mid table and poor teams when we are playing at home - especially when we aren't doing so well against the elite clubs. If we can't beat these teams at home, logic dictates that we can't beat these teams away from and we can't beat better teams at home or away. The inabaility to beat them means we would end up in the lower reaches of the division. I didn't state that we will beat them, I stated that we should and must if we wish to compete for CL. It would be very easy to drop away from the top 4. Were 14 points ahead of 5th spot. I know we shouldn't get complacent and a win is expected tomorrow but we won't be dropping out of the top 4 if we were not to win... You say we are comparing ourselves to Liverpool and Man City but should we be? They have far better squads and are where they should be, regularly fighting for top 4/titles. We can still get top 4 without comparing ourselves to those 2 who have spunked hundreds and hundreds of millions of pounds on their squads It's gonna take a collapse of epic proportions for us not to get top 4 given where we find ourselves right now. Not to mention the fact we have no European commitments right now and the other challengers for CL do. We're in a great position and I don't think Rodgers is the kind of manager to let the players 1) lose focus of that but at the same time 2) get complacent about it. The logic you state seems misguided. We didn't beat Norwich at home but beat better sides in Spurs and Arsenal at home? Also, and I know I said we should forget about the 9-0, but by your comment, 'If we can't beat these teams at home, logic dictates that we can't beat these teams away from' that logic wouldn't make sense...
Finnegan Posted 10 January 2020 Posted 10 January 2020 Go back to what was working consistently. 433, Perez and Barnes, Nacho on the bench to change it up if we need to. Praet and Hamza in for Madders and Ndidi and off we go.
Slab Edd Posted 10 January 2020 Posted 10 January 2020 17 hours ago, mazarron fox said: Strange as it sounds I like that but then what do I know? Its something I conjured up in my mad mind. Honestly it's not gonna happen because Rodgers isn't leaving chilwell on his own again probably
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.