Ric Flair Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 47 minutes ago, Hales said: We don't have the best results without them? Yes I absolutely want them back in the team. Results without Chilwell: Won 4 Drew 2 Lost 1 Results without Maddison: Won 2 Drew 1
Guest An Sionnach Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 22 minutes ago, Ric Flair said: Results without Chilwell: Won 4 Drew 2 Lost 1 Results without Maddison: Won 2 Drew 1 If Chilwell is at wing back absolutely fine , I always thought James and Youri get in each others way , over to you Bren to sort that one out.
Ollie93 Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 I'd like to see Praet in, playing just infront of Ndidi, his passing and vision are the best we've got imo.
Rugby_City Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 Massive game for us and Bournemouth! Watford play Newcastle at home and West Ham are playing Norwich so their is a possibility that they could be 6 points behind by the time we play them. Bournemouth's next games also away at Manchester City so I think they have no choice but to come out and try and win this game which should play into our hands. They looked solid yesterday against Spurs but I thought Tottenham were abysmal rather than Bournemouth being good. They ran themselves into the ground and looked shattered after the game so you would hope that our extra rest and preparation time will help us for this one. The only concern I have us if they score first because then they will have a flat back 10., if we score first I expect them to crumble as their confidence is very fragile at the moment, especially if the Watford and West Ham results go against them at the weekend.
Gevans_97 Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 58 minutes ago, Ric Flair said: Results without Chilwell: Won 4 Drew 2 Lost 1 Results without Maddison: Won 2 Drew 1 Because of our good start, and the fact we’ve had good results when we’ve rotated, you can probably make these stats work against the players for quite a few of them in our team... Results without Vardy: Won 2 Lost 1 Results without Perez: Won 3 Drew 2 imo, only player that we really miss is Wilf. Results without Wilf: Won 1 Drew 2 Lost 3 i think it’s harsh to suggest that we play better without Maddison and Chilwell in the team. Maddison is our best creator, yes he’s not on the best form but we lose creativity when he’s not playing. Less so with Chilwell, he’s not had the best season. But I think he’s a bit of a scapegoat on here.
moore_94 Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 Referee is Stuart Attwell - yet to ref a game for us this season 4th Official is Simon Hooper VAR is Stephen Child - can find hardly anything on this guy, either seems to more regularly be a linesman or the assistant VAR
jeffschlupp Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 3 minutes ago, moore_94 said: Referee is Stuart Attwell - yet to ref a game for us this season 4th Official is Simon Hooper VAR is Stephen Child - can find hardly anything on this guy, either seems to more regularly be a linesman or the assistant VAR PL website says Child is AVAR, Pawson is VAR.
Wymsey Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 From his Wiki page, Attwell is from Nuneaton. That could make him a Coventry supporter..
StanSP Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 We sticking with 3 at the back for this then? Think it'll work in this game better than the Arsenal one where their attack was far too good for it. Ndidi, Youri sit deeper, Perez in the middle further up. Justin and Albrighton as wingbacks. Iheanacho and Vardy up front.
Guest Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 Will Youri be able to pass forward against a shit Bournemouth? Really wish we had maddison in. I'd start Praet over Youri as he passes forwards and gets himself into the box. But in all honesty whoever we play should be able to beat a team who are going to struggle to stay in the championship next season. They could easily be League 1 by this time next season.
Lesta2014 Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 Chilwell and Maddison both not playing due to pending moves?
red5 Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 10 minutes ago, Lesta2014 said: Chilwell and Maddison both not playing due to pending moves?
Legend_in_blue Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 Momentum in these games is key, especially with these daft mini breaks. Score first and we will win this game. Concede first and it'll be a slog.
AKCJ Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 1 minute ago, red5 said: https://giphy.com/gifs/l0MYCdgXBL5YDWNyw/html5 Don't be so ridiculous.
Grebfromgrebland Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 I'm really nervous about this one. All our games have been must win but we have beat palace which we don't always do and we managed a draw against arsenal. We need a minor miracle to keep to 4 now I think.
Grebfromgrebland Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 13 minutes ago, Lesta2014 said: Chilwell and Maddison both not playing due to pending moves? Did cross my mind too. Madison STILL hasn't signed a contract extension and Chilwell might be looking for a move. Both know they can move to a champions League club in a summer. Haven't other players refused to play to secure moves in the summer? Eg Lallana
fuchsntf Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 1 hour ago, Rugby_City said: Massive game for us and Bournemouth! Watford play Newcastle at home and West Ham are playing Norwich so their is a possibility that they could be 6 points behind by the time we play them. Bournemouth's next games also away at Manchester City so I think they have no choice but to come out and try and win this game which should play into our hands. They looked solid yesterday against Spurs but I thought Tottenham were abysmal rather than Bournemouth being good. They ran themselves into the ground and looked shattered after the game so you would hope that our extra rest and preparation time will help us for this one. The only concern I have us if they score first because then they will have a flat back 10., if we score first I expect them to crumble as their confidence is very fragile at the moment, especially if the Watford and West Ham results go against them at the weekend. They could come out...and wup our ever obliging heroes....
Guest An Sionnach Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 If Bournemouth want to be a premiership club , they should do something about their terrible facilities . The premiership should refuse entry to any club without a 20,000 seater stadium minimum. Its one of the wealthiest towns in England ffs.
volpeazzurro Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 54 minutes ago, StanSP said: We sticking with 3 at the back for this then? Think it'll work in this game better than the Arsenal one where their attack was far too good for it. Ndidi, Youri sit deeper, Perez in the middle further up. Justin and Albrighton as wingbacks. Iheanacho and Vardy up front. Praet in for Perez for me. He's more likely to thread a ball through to Vardy or Nacho. Perez, though admittedly better in the middle than stuck out on the wing, still got regularly outmuscled and lost the ball or passed it to the opposition. Though to be fair, I'd have Praet over Tielemans as well.
Hales Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 1 hour ago, Lesta2014 said: Chilwell and Maddison both not playing due to pending moves? 1 hour ago, red5 said: 🙄😴
Spudulike Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 1 hour ago, An Sionnach said: If Bournemouth want to be a premiership club , they should do something about their terrible facilities . The premiership should refuse entry to any club without a 20,000 seater stadium minimum. Its one of the wealthiest towns in England ffs. Why would they want to play in the Scottish League?
RonnieTodger Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 On 07/07/2020 at 23:51, Aus Fox said: Kasper Evans Soyuncu Grey Tielemans Madison Barnes Perez Vardy Iheanacho Hirst Attack, Attack, Attack attack attack. Isn’t that the formation from table football?
UniFox21 Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 2 hours ago, red5 said: Seriously what is your issue?
OntarioFox Posted 10 July 2020 Posted 10 July 2020 1 hour ago, An Sionnach said: If Bournemouth want to be a premiership club , they should do something about their terrible facilities . The premiership should refuse entry to any club without a 20,000 seater stadium minimum. Its one of the wealthiest towns in England ffs. I hate this mentality. I agree that Bournemouth could have (and probably should have) invested in a stadium expansion by now - their ground is in the middle of a park for Christ's sake, so it's not like they're boxed in. But grounds like theirs are part of the variety and fun of football. It's a tidy little stadium and by no means a bad ground - the only real downside of its size is (a bit like us now we've grown our fanbase so considerably) that it's incredibly difficult to get a ticket to a match unless you're in a supporters' club or know someone. It maybe shows a little lack of ambition on their part, but Bournemouth's sensible model is one I think a lot of teams their size envy.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.