Cengiz Signs!

[Steve Earle]

1 hour ago, Facecloth said:

I think he trust Albrighton, but playing him means playing Under too so its a no.

Not sure about that.

Can see Albrighton coming on for Ricardo. Can’t see Under coming on at all.

[Jimothy]

6 minutes ago, Steve Earle said:

Not sure about that.

Can see Albrighton coming on for Ricardo. Can’t see Under coming on at all.

Oh I don't think he'll mind Albrighton playing wing back, but he would be unlikely to start him there. So has Albrighton started it would mostly likely be on the wing.

[Blue ROI]

That looks like the end for Under.

 

Close the thread. 

[SemperEadem]

Yeah no coming back for him now.

[Lesta2014]

Must be if plays so many we HAVe to sign him? Only explanation? 

[Stevosevic]

He's a dud. 

 

Glad its just a loan.

[FoxinNotts]

To be fair, Brighton at home might suit him for a starting berth 

[Bert]

1 minute ago, FoxinNotts said:

To be fair, Brighton at home might suit him for a starting berth 

Looks like the bench again on Saturday then seeing as it’s away 

[Marshall Cockney Fox]

We best not mention him again. Only frustration will come of it. Seems BR would rather play the kit man than ...........🤫

[NaijaFox]

Think it's bye-bye to Under.

 

Ironically, didn't want him to come on tonight, as it seems it's the only situation he gets to see any action and he invariably ends up trying to force play.

[STUHILL]

Brendan has clearly seen enough. 

 

Just wonder if there is a clause in his loan, based on appearances/minutes

 

Either way, he will be gone in the summer and the hunt for a winger goes on!

[hejammy]

My annoyance with the whole Under isn't really that he doesn't start him or rarely brings him on. If BR doesn't rate him, he doesn't rate him. That's fine. But then why does he use up a space on the bench? Why name him as a sub. Why not have one of the youth there? Just doesn't make sense. 

[ozvaldo]

I think he’s alright...

[turlo]

Safe to say that Under is done. When we switched to 4 1 4 1 he could've put Under on for Amartey and left Ricardo at right back. Instead he moved Ricardo to right wing and Amartey to right back. 

 

[RowlattsFox]

Charlie Taylor was a threat down the left, can understand why he didn't come but do think we could've been braver. 

[foxes_rule1978]

1 minute ago, turlo said:

Safe to say that Under is done. When we switched to 4 1 4 1 he could've put Under on for Amartey and left Ricardo at right back. Instead he moved Ricardo to right wing and Amartey to right back. 

 

It is clear he favours Ricardo in the attacking position now... that isn’t good when the full back is called into your position 

[Charl91]

Under is done at the club.

 

Shame, he never really got much of a chance, but clear Brendan doesn't rate him.

 

Still, it baffles me that he's willing to give Choudhury more chances than Under....

[Dan]

That's him done here. Beyond any doubt at this point.

[OhYesNdidi]

6 minutes ago, foxes_rule1978 said:

It is clear he favours Ricardo in the attacking position now... that isn’t good when the full back is called into your position 

Think it was more amarteys height? Burnley set pieces etc

[foxes_rule1978]

Just now, OhYesNdidi said:

Think it was more amarteys height? Burnley set pieces etc

I have seen Ricardo be played there in front of under a couple of times recently... we will see if under gets game time but I don’t think he will  get much, especially if he can’t start with the injuries we are carrying. 

[sacreblueits442]

12 minutes ago, turlo said:

Safe to say that Under is done. When we switched to 4 1 4 1 he could've put Under on for Amartey and left Ricardo at right back. Instead he moved Ricardo to right wing and Amartey to right back. 

 

...probably had agreed to play Tavares and did not have the space to introduce Ünder!!!

[StanSP]

I'd love to get The Undertaker's thoughts on this after his tweet once we signed him...

[Gerard]

49 minutes ago, Charl91 said:

Under is done at the club.

 

Shame, he never really got much of a chance, but clear Brendan doesn't rate him.

 

Still, it baffles me that he's willing to give Choudhury more chances than Under....

 

Under has had every chance, you put a 15yo Messi into the U16's and he probably impresses enough to be in the first team within a month. 

 

It's not just in matches that BR has judged him but every day in training. I was quite excited to get Under on loan as he was touted as one of the best prospects in Europe three years a go and was signed by Monchi who is rated as the best talent spotter in the world by many. Even the Turkish lads were saying he's their best attacking player and Turkey is a good footballing nation. I'm quite surprised how poor he has been judging him on his CV.

Edited 3 March 2021 by Gerard

[Greyowl]

There is clearly a communication problem between him and Brendan. Otherwise Under is the best dribbler in the team together with Barnes. His accelaration and shot power is quite obvious. He is dangerous for sure.He should maybe advance his English if had not done so far. A permanent contract is not likely, though  if he is sincerely happy in England and signed by another team, that might cause some regrets.

[kiwiturk]

I agree he's done here.

So sad such a talent receives praises from Italian legends such as Vieri and Totti but not prefered by BR.

Choudhury for Under today? 

Anyway, we have Kasper to thank today not to BR's master game plan.

 

 

https://www.dailysabah.com/sports/football/former-italian-footballers-praise-turkeys-cengiz-under

Edited 3 March 2021 by kiwiturk