Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
moore_94

Hamza Choudhury

By moore_94, in Transfer Talk

Recommended Posts

Dames

Dames

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, majaco said:

You must be an itk of how he thinks.

Not really, its a well known fact that both Barnes and Hamza are out as often as humanly possible. 

 

Explains why Barnes seems to be injured far more frequently and Hamza is always missing through 'illness'. 

  • Like 1
majaco

majaco

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Father Ted said:

More appearances in the last 6 weeks at Turkey Cafe than he’s made for us in pre season probably suggests I’m right 👍

he doesn't get picked for the Turkey cafe.  He chooses to go there.

 

I can't recall a game he's played where he hasn't put in a shift.   Rodgers doesn't like him, doesn't pick him so he hasn't developed.  Hopefully, he will move on and do well somewhere else.  

Father Ted

Father Ted

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, majaco said:

he doesn't get picked for the Turkey cafe.  He chooses to go there.

 

I can't recall a game he's played where he hasn't put in a shift.   Rodgers doesn't like him, doesn't pick him so he hasn't developed.  Hopefully, he will move on and do well somewhere else.  

Ok Hamza

  • Like 2
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

I can't hold it against him really. Not his fault he's not good enough for us, nor that we decided to give him a contract that's not only wildly disproportionate to his ability but will also price him out of loan or permanent moves to all but the wealthiest Championship teams, who can probably do better anyway.

SafewayFox

SafewayFox

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Foxxed said:

The party was long ago and he wasn’t the only one. It’s best he gets playing time elsewhere but I have no motivation for personal attacks.

Firstly, if you thought my post at all attacked you…far from it so apologies if you felt that way.

 

But the party was one of MANY things that Hamza seems to be involved with which you’d not say is the definition of ultra professional.

 

Hence why I said you can’t blame Rodgers for his lack of game time/enthusiasm.

The Blur

The Blur

Posted
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, OriginalRobboFOX said:

Going Watford…. 

 

Source?

Edited by The Blur
cruzFOX

cruzFOX

Posted
Posted

At this point the club just has to get these fringe players moved on. Whatever it takes. Time is ticking and we’re in a jam. Gotta make moves with some urgency or we become paralysed. Goodbye Hamsa hope you do well wherever you go.

VLC86

VLC86

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Dames said:

Not really, its a well known fact that both Barnes and Hamza are out as often as humanly possible. 

 

Explains why Barnes seems to be injured far more frequently and Hamza is always missing through 'illness'. 

I’ve always assumed that ‘illness’ actually means an STD with Hamza, not sure why.

  • Haha 3
  • Popular Post
deep blue

deep blue

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
3 hours ago, The_77 said:

Have you read any of this thread? lolPeople love to bash Hamza. Doubt anyone would say half of the crap on here to his face, though. 

I asked on one thread, some time ago, if anyone could name a game where Hamza had let us down.  Not one reply.  He wouldn't be viewed as being ovepaid if he'd been given more pitch time, and that's down to Rodgers. How many games have we seen over the last 2 years when we desperately needed someone on with a bit more bite and fight in midfield?  I think he's been shunned and underused by Rodgers, and he's not the only squad member to suffer that.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 3
Grebfromgrebland

Grebfromgrebland

Posted
Posted
Just now, deep blue said:

I asked on one thread, some time ago, if anyone could name a game where Hamza had let us down.  Not one reply.  He wouldn't be viewed as being ovepaid if he'd been given more pitch time, and that's down to Rodgers. How many games have we seen over the last 2 years when we desperately needed someone on with a bit more bite and fight in midfield?  I think he's been shunned and underused by Rodgers, and he's not the only squad member to suffer that.

Maybe it's his 'attitude'. 

majaco

majaco

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, deep blue said:

I asked on one thread, some time ago, if anyone could name a game where Hamza had let us down.  Not one reply.  He wouldn't be viewed as being ovepaid if he'd been given more pitch time, and that's down to Rodgers. How many games have we seen over the last 2 years when we desperately needed someone on with a bit more bite and fight in midfield?  I think he's been shunned and underused by Rodgers, and he's not the only squad member to suffer that.

He was praised highly for the games he played in last season. 

 

I agree with much of what you posted.  I don't have a huge problem with Rodgers not using him;  managers have to be decisive.

SafewayFox

SafewayFox

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, deep blue said:

I asked on one thread, some time ago, if anyone could name a game where Hamza had let us down.  Not one reply.  He wouldn't be viewed as being ovepaid if he'd been given more pitch time, and that's down to Rodgers. How many games have we seen over the last 2 years when we desperately needed someone on with a bit more bite and fight in midfield?  I think he's been shunned and underused by Rodgers, and he's not the only squad member to suffer that.

Easy….the last game of the season against United…their first goal was a penalty that started with his awful first touch to give the ball away deep in our own half.

 

Hamza is an extremely limited player and if he gets minutes and has a senior CB next to him shouting orders he could end up being a top end Championship CB/DM.

 

I watch Rodgers all the time and how much he has to constantly talk to Hamza was the same level as Gray and think it’s fair to say he hasn’t pulled up trees since he left?

Edited by SafewayFox
  • Like 2
FLAN

FLAN

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, deep blue said:

I asked on one thread, some time ago, if anyone could name a game where Hamza had let us down.  Not one reply.  He wouldn't be viewed as being ovepaid if he'd been given more pitch time, and that's down to Rodgers. How many games have we seen over the last 2 years when we desperately needed someone on with a bit more bite and fight in midfield?  I think he's been shunned and underused by Rodgers, and he's not the only squad member to suffer that.

1 min 3 secs or thereabouts. Quite significant 

 

https://youtu.be/pReRHI7jmuY

ARM1968

ARM1968

Posted
Posted (edited)

Think we home in on some players a bit relentlessly to be honest. Hamza is never going to set the world alight, but he might carry the torch so someone else can. He has always been quite honest and worked hard on the pitch from what I have seen. 
 

it is  true that he likely will never hit the heights we all think we deserve now, but he could do a good job for someone and I hope he does. 

Edited by ARM1968
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Popular Post
Steve Earle

Steve Earle

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
2 hours ago, OriginalRobboFOX said:

Going Watford…. 

For those of us not brought up in Leicester I am reliably informed this means ‘Going TO Watford’.

 

Reminds me how much I used to enjoy the SpeakProperLestoh pieces in The Fox!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 6
Lambert09

Lambert09

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, deep blue said:

I asked on one thread, some time ago, if anyone could name a game where Hamza had let us down.  Not one reply.  He wouldn't be viewed as being ovepaid if he'd been given more pitch time, and that's down to Rodgers. How many games have we seen over the last 2 years when we desperately needed someone on with a bit more bite and fight in midfield?  I think he's been shunned and underused by Rodgers, and he's not the only squad member to suffer that.

it’s not so much as he lets us down through mistakes but just that he is too limited on the ball for how we play.  The same can be said about wilf but the fact he regains possession so much makes up for it. (or it used to) 

 

Hamza never really became the ndidi type player we thought he could and when we used him, we tried him in more ball playing areas, which he’s just not good enough at. 

 

Put him in a midfield 3 in the championship where his sole job is to win the ball and lay it off and he will do fine. 

Edited by Lambert09
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Foxxed

Foxxed

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, SafewayFox said:

Firstly, if you thought my post at all attacked you…far from it so apologies if you felt that way.

 

But the party was one of MANY things that Hamza seems to be involved with which you’d not say is the definition of ultra professional.

 

Hence why I said you can’t blame Rodgers for his lack of game time/enthusiasm.

Nah. I meant personal attacks against him. I don’t care about his personal life. It’s best he moves on, gets game time and gets off the wage bill. He’s obviously rich but I can’t imagine this is how he wanted his career to progress after getting some initial support and game time.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...