Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
StanSP

Cesare Casadei

By StanSP, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

sacreblueits442

sacreblueits442

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, bongo92 said:

As others have said; how can you judge a youth prospect in a handful of games playing some of his first senior competitive games?

 

classic FT

...he is 20 years old, last season he was at Reading!!!

  He is not a 16 year old coming through, if anything you can give him a pass due to the style of play is not what he has been playing, but he looks lacklustre, at best.

  • Like 1
fuchsntf

fuchsntf

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, foxile5 said:

He looks a bit unusual for his position given his size. I'm not convinced of his movement. I suppose we'll have the season to make a decision.

His best position is coming on from the subs bench..

Seems to have more nous and forethought when coming on later..

gurru991

gurru991

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Claridge said:

Very hard to hide a total lack of pace in todays game. Movement is good but has no extra gear to accelerate into the space

Lack of pace is a problem in English football especially at the Premier league level !! Italian football  is played  at a slower pace and he may struggle with the English game unless he can find another gear. 

  • Like 1
Paninistickers

Paninistickers

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, WigstonWanderer said:

Wait! Didn’t we send Harry Kane packing? Right load of shite that one! 😂

 

Seriously though, no from me.

Believe it or not, some of us rated him even then. True I had no idea he'd be turn out to be that good, but the mismanagement of him wasn't Pearson's finest hour. 

Guest nathan.

Guest nathan.

Posted
Posted

It’s worrying that he has championship experience but still looks off the pace.

foxile5

foxile5

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, Paninistickers said:

Believe it or not, some of us rated him even then. True I had no idea he'd be turn out to be that good, but the mismanagement of him wasn't Pearson's finest hour. 

I don't think it was mismanagement.

 

I think it was that he didn't have the requisite quality in his position to displace others but had the quality to start.

Paninistickers

Paninistickers

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, foxile5 said:

I don't think it was mismanagement.

 

I think it was that he didn't have the requisite quality in his position to displace others but had the quality to start.

He played Kane on the wing. After the lad (at the time a lad, had done very well at Millwall up front) .... Pearson was scrambling for a result at the time (did t we go from a comfortable second place to a 12 game streak without a win?) ....it wasn't Pearson's forte dealing with that. 

foxile5

foxile5

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Paninistickers said:

He played Kane on the wing. After the lad (at the time a lad, had done very well at Millwall up front) .... Pearson was scrambling for a result at the time (did t we go from a comfortable second place to a 12 game streak without a win?) ....it wasn't Pearson's forte dealing with that. 

You make a good point.

 

I don't think that most managers would have viewed him as the solution to front with what we had in the tank.

 

Either way - he didn't look like he'd be England's top scorer at that point in time.

 

Time makes idiots of us all.

  • Like 1
BKLFox

BKLFox

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, fuchsntf said:

His best position is coming on from the subs bench..

Seems to have more nous and forethought when coming on later..

Wrong thread did you mean to put this in the Nacho 1?

  • Haha 1
Sly

Sly

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, foxile5 said:

You make a good point.

 

I don't think that most managers would have viewed him as the solution to front with what we had in the tank.

 

Either way - he didn't look like he'd be England's top scorer at that point in time.

 

Time makes idiots of us all.

Players develop differently and match fitness is a thing.

 

We need to give Butch time.

 

The mobility thing does concern me though, as he looks like a Caveman towing a T-Rex. 

  • Haha 1
volpeazzurro

volpeazzurro

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, SkidsFox said:

The poster above who compared him to YT may be onto something.

There's a difference to being not overly quick or being bone idle with fitness in question and thinking that you're a lot better than you really are.

iancognito

iancognito

Posted
Posted

My jury's staying out on him for a while yet. His highlights reel wasn't the greatest but he's had a few decent touches and moments here and there even if he's been a bit shit generally. May end up being a great back up if not a great starter.

sm1

sm1

Posted
Posted

I saw him play a few pre season games for Chelsea and he looked good, but he's looked completely lost the last 2 games, very slow and ponderous. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...