Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
CosbehFox

The "do they mean us?" thread pt 2

Recommended Posts

On 18/11/2020 at 18:25, Fox in the North said:

Love these photos of both stadiums close together. Can’t wait for another photo like this once the stadium expansion is done. :cool:

 

Still sad to see the filbert street outline mind you :(

Are they ever going to fully redevelop that area, or not? :P 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TK95 said:

Any statto's out there able to work out how many shots from open play we had vs Man City and Arsenal away and Wolves at home last season? I'm not overly concerned by this stat right now, we've shut up shop against teams we have been notoriously poor against over the years and the penalties we have got (almost all of them valid even after relying on VAR) have in some cases allowed us to get a stranglehold on games and then shut the game down for the win.

 

I'd expect us to push harder in attack if and when we need to and against weaker opposition that we are going to face over the coming weeks. We have been exceptional away from home and only played once at home in the league since the West Ham and Villa debacles, I think these stats on paper look a concern but having watched our games and consider past performances against the same or similar teams and our need to play a certain way due to a lot of injuries (most of which are about to return) then there's plenty of caveats to put on this.

 

I'll be more than happy if we register 5 open play shots on Sunday, that'll probably means we'll have scored at least twice and throw another peno in for good measure 😂

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Ted Maul said:

 

What a goal- amazing that it wasn't even the best one we scored that night. 

 

His army of supporters don't seem to be too pleased with Man City and Pep in the comments, glad we got rid of them lol

I do miss Mahrez’s brilliance, such A great player.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, brucey said:

This in the comments lol Which club is going to come along and #FreeMahrez?

 

EnLyB0mXYAE7EFQ?format=jpg&name=medium

The funny thing is, that chant doesn't even rhyme if they're speaking French. :ph34r:

 

Algerian fans really are the weirdest bunch on the planet, but I guess there's not that much else going for them except a history of pretty unpleasant oppression by Charles De Gaulle and being where France tested their nukes. Which probably explains the weird dual-language chant - you know how annoyed the French get by others butchering their language. :fishing:

Edited by OntarioFox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brendan Rodgers’ Anfield past brings power of ignition to latest reunion

 

t was unbelievable. It was pure football power destruction.” It is an oddity of the calendar that Leicester’s trip to Anfield on Sunday night will break a spell of 11 months since these two Premier League teams last met. No ordinary 11 months, either. Take a look at the highlights from the King Power Stadium, Boxing Day 2019, and it starts to look like something else, a last dance before the end times.

 

Liverpool had been enthroned as Club World Cup champions. Five days after beating Flamengo 1-0 in Doha, they walked out at a boisterously postprandial King Power and produced the defining performance of their title season: a ruthless, high-throttle 4-0 evisceration of opponents who had, until that point, been pushing them at the top of the table.

In the new Liverpool film End of the Storm this is the moment that makes Jürgen Klopp mist over. It still looks like a kind of summit point, an acme of Klopp-era Liverpool, with every working part in sync. By the time Trent Alexander-Arnold had eased forward to score the fourth goal there was a feeling of something other than a sporting contest taking place – a power play, an exhibition.

A festive crowd cooed and gurgled. The Liverpool players lingered to applaud the away end. Even the home fans seemed to stream out with an admiring shrug at such controlled destruction.

 

Five days later, the Chinese government recognised the spread of a new flu-like disease in the city of Wuhan. Within three months the season, the working world and indeed life for the foreseeable future had all been decisively disrupted. Leicester versus Liverpool: never such innocence again. Or at least, not yet anyway.

Liverpool had reached a point of ignition, springboard for a 10-match winning run that devastated the rest of the field. For Leicester this was a moment of traction the other way. From 14 points clear of Manchester United on Boxing Day, they ended up four points behind and clinging on to a European spot.

The bounce back this season – top of the table, six straight wins – has been equally notable, if not exactly a surprise given the buoyancy of this team and of their manager. This is the other notable feature of Liverpool versus Leicester: the man in the blue corner.

Leicester’s progress under Brendan Rodgers in the past 18 months is confirmation of something that perhaps needed restating in the Premier League. Rodgers remains a genuinely high-class manager, and a relatively young one at 47. He is also a curious figure in Liverpool’s modern history.

Here is that rare thing, a trophy-less manager, “mutually consented” from the job, who can still claim a degree of authorship in the success that followed. Rodgers is in no realistic sense the father, or the grandfather or even the uncle to the Klopp supremacy. But he is perhaps a fond second cousin.

Rodgers at Liverpool: it is still hard to get a clear look at this, an era that seems to escape easy categorisation. One reason is the entropy of the final months, a deathly end-game that culminated in a souring of internal relations with the nadir of a grisly 6-1 defeat at Stoke in May 2015.

 

This was how Rodgers unravelled at Liverpool. Some get nasty, some get mad. Rodgers seemed to go further into himself, to get lost in his own persona. But looking back – and for all the online scorn, the cringeworthy TV documentary snippets – there was a coherence to his actions, to his relationship to the club since and to what he left behind.

It is notable that the defining team of his time at Liverpool disappeared fairly quickly. Jordan Henderson is the only regular from that title-chasing vintage still in the front rank six years on – and Rodgers was initially sceptical about him, trying at one stage to offload Liverpool’s future captain to Fulham.

But the Rodgers era also coincided with a return to basic good husbandry. For a while the most obvious sign was the sheer volume of players exiting the club, among them Paul Konchesky, Christian Poulsen, Alberto Aquilani, Charlie Adam, Joe Cole, Andy Carroll and Stewart Downing.

Rodgers finessed a way of playing, a sense of urgency, a gloss – so important to the club – that what is happening has significance and must meet certain basic standards of modernity and competence.

Plus he produced a team to live up to those ideals during his most memorable season. There are some who will always credit Luis Suárez with the title challenge, just as some will see only the more theatrical elements of the Rogers persona, the Shankly-lite schtick, the air of David Brent-like

 

This is to oversimplify: Rodgers saw what was there and enabled it, hitched his team to that rare attacking talent. And what a time it was. At around the same stage as Klopp’s defining 4-0 at Leicester, Rodgers’s Liverpool set off on a run of 18 wins in 22 games with 74 goals scored that almost made him immortal.

The margins were brutally fine. Henderson’s red card in the final moments of the defeat of Manchester City on 13 April left Liverpool with Lucas Leiva and Joe Allen in midfield for the key game against Chelsea. Bad luck, perhaps. But Liverpool also blinked a little.

Rodgers has spoken about how he might have approached that game differently, how anxious his team were to chase the win against a deep double-bolted defence. Aged 41, this was his first time in that place, as manager or player.

 

This is also key to the Rodgers story, his own unusual path from outside to in, one that mirrors in some ways that of Klopp. Rodgers was, if anything, more meteoric. It took him four years to go from a standing start at Watford to his unveiling at Anfield by Tom Werner, fresh-faced and a little dazzled by the lights.

What would have followed had Rodgers’s Liverpool won the league title two years later? Would we have had Klopp’s Liverpool now? The club still spent lavishly in the next transfer window, albeit much of that Suárez-fed binge went on Mario Balotelli, Lazar Markovic, Rickie Lambert and Alberto Moreno.

Meanwhile, the internal workings stagnated. Relationships broke down. James Milner, Joe Gomez and Roberto Firmino turned up just in time to see Rogers leave. But the structures he left were sound enough, the exit music warm rather than destructively bitter (the departing manager even rented his house to Klopp for a while).

Rodgers deserves his footnote in Liverpool’s success. Perhaps he even deserved, in an odd kind of way, to be present, painfully, at the pre-pandemic coronation last December.

 

For now a Leicester team that have been a revelation (yes, another revelation) this season will be desperate to reverse that humiliation in a meeting of two hugely depleted sides. Çaglar Soyuncu and Daniel Amartey are definitely out for Sunday. Ricardo Pereira and Timothy Castagne are still only possibilities. Liverpool have also been further ravaged during the international break.

Scratch squads, a crammed-in fixture list and two teams on a winning roll: 11 months on it promises to be another significant reunion.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2020/nov/22/brendan-rodgers-anfield-past-brings-power-of-ignition-to-latest-reunion

Edited by Buce
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said:

In other news we now have a supporters club in Azerbaijan. 
 

 

 

  Loved the laser throwing Fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Corky said:

https://www.football365.com/news/de-bruyne-overrated-muzzy-izzet-statistic-mailbox

 

Finally. We've all said it here for over 20 years, now it's spread :cool: 

Bit disrespectful to Izzet? I know we all love him but people who he played with speak so highly of him too. I've heard a range of our players say Izzet could've played for any side.

 

De Bruyne is good but people forget how good other players were as well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fox92 said:

Bit disrespectful to Izzet? I know we all love him but people who he played with speak so highly of him too. I've heard a range of our players say Izzet could've played for any side.

 

De Bruyne is good but people forget how good other players were as well.

Possibly but it was highlighting how good Izzet was too. 

 

He was definitely a player the opposition didn't enjoy facing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://arsenal-mania.com/forum/threads/pl-arsenal-v-wolves-sunday-november-29-ko-19-15-gmt-sky-sports.34638/page-86#post-5296405

 

'Terrible.

Aston villa, leicester and now wolves. All 3 teams and man for man you could easily say we have better players than them in those positions. It aint a personell problem'

 

Not sure about that, think I'd only have Auba, Martinelli, Saka and Tierney in our squad, with potentially only Tierney starting over Justin, the rest would all be on the bench or in the reserves. Haven't seen enough of Partey to make a judgement on him yet.

 

Even with our injured squad when we played them, Kasper, Vardy, Tielemans, Fofana, Barnes and Castagne are easily better than their Arsenal counterparts. At full strength we'd also have Ricardo, Ndidi and Cags too.

Edited by Leicester_Loyal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Leicester_Loyal said:

https://arsenal-mania.com/forum/threads/pl-arsenal-v-wolves-sunday-november-29-ko-19-15-gmt-sky-sports.34638/page-86#post-5296405

 

'Terrible.

Aston villa, leicester and now wolves. All 3 teams and man for man you could easily say we have better players than them in those positions. It aint a personell problem'

 

Not sure about that, think I'd only have Auba, Martinelli, Saka and Tierney in our squad, with potentially only Tierney starting over Justin, the rest would all be on the bench or in the reserves. Haven't seen enough of Partey to make a judgement on him yet.

 

Even with our injured squad when we played them, Kasper, Vardy, Tielemans, Fofana, Barnes and Castagne are easily better than their Arsenal counterparts. At full strength we'd also have Ricardo, Ndidi and Cags too.

Could not agree more. Arsenal fans just can't see what's in front of their eyes. They're totally deluded if they think they have better players than us. The fact that they're signing players that a so called rival, Chelsea, has deemed as past it sums it all up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...