Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
simFox

Corona Virus

By simFox, in General Chat

Mark
Message added by Mark

No political discussion in this topic. That is complaining about a country, a politician, a party and/or its voters, etc

Recommended Posts

Leicester_Loyal

Leicester_Loyal

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, l444ry said:

We will be in the shite if this prediction is anywhere near right. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8195771/UK-worst-coronavirus-hit-nation-Europe-66-000-deaths-scientists-predict.html?ito=social-twitter_dailymailUK&__twitter_impression=true

 

I'm no expert and I 'could' be totally wrong, but I think that's bullshit scaremongering. These papers are just creating horrible scenarios to sell papers, or (hopefully) to remind people of how serious this is and how we need to keep up what we're doing.

l444ry

l444ry

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Markyblue said:

Please dont let the facts get in the way of another scaremongering story. 

Probably right, especially as it's from the rag that gave us the laughable Project Fear line which plenty were misled by.

Alf Bentley

Alf Bentley

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, Facecloth said:

What have the Finnish been up too?

 

Behold! The son of God is risen again - and it turns out he's Santa Claus.

 

Happy Easter!

 

 

Guest Markyblue

Guest Markyblue

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, l444ry said:

Probably right, especially as it's from the rag that gave us the laughable Project Fear line which plenty were misled by.

There are various theories on how this will pan out , the government scientists from imperial college have from the start mentioned 20000 deaths in the uk. The last i saw from them mentioned from 7000 to 20000 so its a case of who anybody wants to believe.  

rachhere

rachhere

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Markyblue said:

There are various theories on how this will pan out , the government scientists from imperial college have from the start mentioned 20000 deaths in the uk. The last i saw from them mentioned from 7000 to 20000 so its a case of who anybody wants to believe.  

You would think that Imperial College had access to better data to include in the model seeing they are working with the UK government. 

MC Prussian

MC Prussian

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Facecloth said:

What have the Finnish been up too?FB_IMG_1586257101851.jpg.6f249ebe6e9fc9ba03a5b8aa3c1b3ea4.jpg

Just correcting the numbers, I guess?

Could well be a case previously falsely reported as due to the virus when it wasn't.

brucey

brucey

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Lionator said:

Just reading an nhs critical care paper and it appears that if he can get through this first 24 hours in icu without ventilation then he has a much higher chance (75%+) of survival than if he needs a ventilator in this first 24 hours (35%+). So if we hear that he’s on a ventilator today then the outlook is pretty grim. 

This is of course presuming that he was admitted to ICU under the same qualifying criteria applied to the general population.

 

If indeed it's true that it was done as a 'precaution', then his chances are far better, although then you have the question of why he gets to have a ITU bed in a busy London hospital... 

Guest MattP

Guest MattP

Posted
Posted
Just now, brucey said:

This is of course presuming that he was admitted to ICU under the same qualifying criteria applied to the general population.

 

If indeed it's true that it was done as a 'precaution', then his chances are far better, although then you have the question of why he gets to have a ITU bed in a busy London hospital... 

Because he's the Prime Minister. He is sort of important.

 

(Also according to the briefing as the Nightingale has opened ICU still has more than enough capacity in London)

Jon the Hat

Jon the Hat

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, brucey said:

This is of course presuming that he was admitted to ICU under the same qualifying criteria applied to the general population.

 

If indeed it's true that it was done as a 'precaution', then his chances are far better, although then you have the question of why he gets to have a ITU bed in a busy London hospital... 

He is the first minister of MPs elected by our nation to lead us.  Absolutley everything should be done to help him get better.  I don't understand why so many people seem to think it is some kind of issue of fairness or equality.  It isn't about Boris the person it is about the office of the Prime minister of one of the world great democracies.  

Guest Markyblue

Guest Markyblue

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, brucey said:

This is of course presuming that he was admitted to ICU under the same qualifying criteria applied to the general population.

 

If indeed it's true that it was done as a 'precaution', then his chances are far better, although then you have the question of why he gets to have a ITU bed in a busy London hospital... 

Because as bad as things are or might become i haven't seen anything to suggest the nhs is at or above full capacity yet. 

leicsmac

leicsmac

Posted
Posted

 

3 minutes ago, Jon the Hat said:

He is the first minister of MPs elected by our nation to lead us.  Absolutley everything should be done to help him get better.  I don't understand why so many people seem to think it is some kind of issue of fairness or equality.  It isn't about Boris the person it is about the office of the Prime minister of one of the world great democracies.  

I guess the argument is that if it is truly the office that is important, then it follows that the person occupying it is still no more important than any other person as the institution survives those who occupy it.

 

I'll hasten to add that IMO while that idea has some merit it's not entirely true because the effectiveness of the office does suffer while in transition and that's something that can be ill afforded right now, so I think Boris should probably be prioritised in terms of treatment.

Jimothy

Jimothy

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, StanSP said:

IDS' comments about Boris lol what a tool. 

What did he say?

Jimothy

Jimothy

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, st albans fox said:

As we were warned, todays numbers are not good at all 

My point proven from yesterday. I haven't even seen them yet, but you can't wait to tell everyone they are bad.

Jimothy

Jimothy

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Happy Fox said:


https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-patient-deaths-rise-by-758-in-england-11969899

 

☹️

Yeah it's bad, I'm not saying it's not. What I'm saying is like I said yesterday, there are certain posters who are waiting for that large number and seem to get off from posting it, yet when it's lower they go quiet. I get BBC news notifications on my phone. I posted yesterdays lower figure when I got that notification which comes around the same time most days, and the usual suspects were very quiet. Today, I haven't had that notification on my phone yet, it's too early, yet one of those posters is straight in there with telling us it's getting worse. I just find it odd. Do they get some kind of kick from telling us it's bad, do they feel more alive because they are worrying more? I genuinely can't get my head around it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...