ToeKneeHandCock Posted 27 October 2019 Posted 27 October 2019 Don’t get this disrespect argument. Surely it’s more disrespectful to ease off because you’ve taken pity on a team?
Ric Flair Posted 27 October 2019 Posted 27 October 2019 The disrespect argument is due to the accusations made against the USA women's team, and why the same isn't being levelled against Leicester. I was oblivious to the supposed criticism back in the summer with the women's World Cup but this is why some are bringing it up.
Nalis Posted 27 October 2019 Posted 27 October 2019 31 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said: Keiran speaks the truth and with a lot of sense. The responder is either on the wind up or deluded.
FireFox Posted 27 October 2019 Posted 27 October 2019 12 minutes ago, Ric Flair said: The disrespect argument is due to the accusations made against the USA women's team, and why the same isn't being levelled against Leicester. I was oblivious to the supposed criticism back in the summer with the women's World Cup but this is why some are bringing it up. Which is a ridiculous compassion. The criticism came from the difference in quality the USWNT had over their opponents, and why, such as simply having a huge pool of players to select from because of the county's population.. or finances/resources for training and preparing. Basically, the players are representing their countries, which have huge differences, differences that are out of the control of that country's footballing organization. Southampton have been in the Premier League 2 seasons longer than us, so their lack of quality and failures are their own as a club. Idealy, (if there wasn't a record to go for and a golden boot to try to win, then) to "let off" without actually doing so in a disrespectful way, after the first half Rodgers could have made some substitutions; give Hamza and JJ some game time. But we only have 3 subs to make and a game a few days later. 1
SouthStandUpperTier Posted 27 October 2019 Posted 27 October 2019 32 minutes ago, Ric Flair said: The disrespect argument is due to the accusations made against the USA women's team, and why the same isn't being levelled against Leicester. I was oblivious to the supposed criticism back in the summer with the women's World Cup but this is why some are bringing it up. Leicester and Southampton are similar sized clubs, with similar budgets and similar histories. The Thailand Women's team qualified for the World Cup by virtue of beating Timor, Cambodia and Myanmar. They were getting hammered in warm up games by teams that hadn't even qualified for the World Cup. While there may well have been an element of sexism in the criticism the US Women's team got, the two games aren't really comparable. 2
Koke Posted 27 October 2019 Posted 27 October 2019 18 hours ago, Babylon said: If that was Liverpool scoring the 9, you think people would be talking about Saints? I agree. If Liverpool had won 9-0 nothing else would have been talked about for 7 straight days.
ealingfox Posted 27 October 2019 Posted 27 October 2019 Literally like 3 people criticised the USA team a bit and people trying to make a point are acting like it was universal condemnation.
norwichfox Posted 27 October 2019 Posted 27 October 2019 quite honestly, I couldn't give a flying fcuk about women's football. 2 1
Matt Posted 27 October 2019 Posted 27 October 2019 This disrespectful point - These are the type of people that don't believe in sports day at school. That everyone should get a prize and that there are no winners and no losers. 1
The Year Of The Fox Posted 27 October 2019 Posted 27 October 2019 45 minutes ago, norwichfox said: quite honestly, I couldn't give a flying fcuk about women's football. Total non event isn’t it I wish people would stop trying to pretend otherwise too 2
Popular Post Leeds Fox Posted 27 October 2019 Popular Post Posted 27 October 2019 32 minutes ago, Matt said: This disrespectful point - These are the type of people that don't believe in sports day at school. That everyone should get a prize and that there are no winners and no losers. Everyone’s a winner. There are no losers. Except for Southampton... they’re losers. 5
fuchsntf Posted 27 October 2019 Posted 27 October 2019 35 minutes ago, Matt said: This disrespectful point - These are the type of people that don't believe in sports day at school. That everyone should get a prize and that there are no winners and no losers. This.!!
Guest Mickyblueeyes Posted 27 October 2019 Posted 27 October 2019 What if we did take the foot off the pedal and Saints came out in the second half and got two quick goals and then a third. The result sits at 5-3. Isn’t that disrespectful to the the fans who travelled up to watch us play that they only got one half of effort from the side. It’s a bollocks argument. Southampton lost a man, rightly so. Plenty of teams go ten men down. And don’t lose 9-0. We played extremely well, they didn’t and couldn’t cope. End of.
Captain... Posted 27 October 2019 Posted 27 October 2019 Personally I think we should be praised for our ruthlessness, we were putting the tackles in playing our football the proper way and got our rewards. One striker has played himself into some form getting goals vital for confidence another had cemented himself at the top of the top scorer table, our young midfielders got goals and assists all part of their education.
tylesta Posted 27 October 2019 Posted 27 October 2019 Why should we take it easier. Gd could work in our favour come the end of the season.
Guest kristianity77 Posted 27 October 2019 Posted 27 October 2019 Surely Southampton were being disrespectful to the game by downing tools when they went one nil down. They showed absolutely sod all fight for the last 80 minutes. Where is the respect there for the 25 thousand paying customers at what 35 quid a throw? We weren't disrespectful at all. Southampton persisted in playing football in a way that was only going to get them hammered and they didn't really change it, and they certainly never adopted a damage limitation strategy at any point. All we did was do our job.
Popular Post The Horse's Mouth Posted 27 October 2019 Popular Post Posted 27 October 2019 On 26/10/2019 at 12:54, Yes said: Love that When you actually think of it since we've come up some of the stories around the club wouldve made a cracking few seasons of dream team 3 2
Unabomber Posted 27 October 2019 Posted 27 October 2019 I think there should be a new rule where for every goal after 5 you score in a game you get an additional half a point. Where would we be now with my new rules? Just missed the chance for an additional half a point v Newcastle but picked up 2 more Friday.
Popular Post Tanya Posted 27 October 2019 Popular Post Posted 27 October 2019 1 hour ago, The Year Of The Fox said: Total non event isn’t it I wish people would stop trying to pretend otherwise too I much prefer men's football but the women's world cup was a lot of fun and anything that encourages young girls to love this game is a good thing. At the moment only a few teams play with real skill and pace but hopefully when the game grows this will change. So, yeah, don't like the game, that's fine but to belittle it is just...ew. On topic, if I were a Saints fan I would be more offended if I thought LCFC took their foot off the gas. This celebration argument when discussing two fully professional teams in the same division is very daft. 10
Popular Post GlenParvaFox Posted 27 October 2019 Popular Post Posted 27 October 2019 22 hours ago, The Syrup said: ESPN asking if we disrespected Southampton by scoring 9 against them. FFS, theres always someone who wants to criticise even when we break records The short answer to that is, no. The question wouldn't even be asked if the likes of Man City and Liverpool had done it; They'd be drooling out their mouths and down below, over every goal. 7
Arkie Bennett Posted 27 October 2019 Posted 27 October 2019 1 minute ago, GlenParvaFox said: The short answer to that is, no. The question wouldn't even be asked if the likes of Man City and Liverpool had done it; They'd be drooling out their mouths and down below, over every goal. That's right. If Spurs had done it with Kane getting a hat trick, the media would never let us hear the end of it.
st albans fox Posted 27 October 2019 Posted 27 October 2019 Best priced 75/1 fourth favourites for the title .....
Koke Posted 27 October 2019 Posted 27 October 2019 Theres a bloke on Sunday Supplement who called the Bertrand red an "appalling" decision by the ref. Weird. I get if you think it was "harsh" or "unlucky" but to call it appalling is bizarre. It looked worse on slow motion, true, but it was still a dangerous tackle. 2
Finnegan Posted 27 October 2019 Posted 27 October 2019 23 hours ago, The Syrup said: ESPN asking if we disrespected Southampton by scoring 9 against them. FFS, theres always someone who wants to criticise even when we break records This is an American sports thing. They have a concept called "running up the score" which is essentially piling on the points / goals when the game is already a "blow out." It's considered a faux pas. Personally think going in to cruise mode to patronise the opponent is actually a lot more disrespectful but hey ho the yanks are weird. 4
davieG Posted 27 October 2019 Posted 27 October 2019 3 minutes ago, Koke said: Theres a bloke on Sunday Supplement who called the Bertrand red an "appalling" decision by the ref. Weird. I get if you think it was "harsh" or "unlucky" but to call it appalling is bizarre. It looked worse on slow motion, true, but it was still a dangerous tackle. ..... and this is why VAR will never resolve incidents because too many so called experts being paid to give their (controversial) opinions. Not being entirely serious but they should probably ban all media discussion of VAR incidents, apart from anything else it's boring having to listen to them at the expense of discussing the actual football being played. 3
Recommended Posts