Ayoze Perez

[Guest Markyblue]

Gray has been here much longer and people still want him to be given longer, i still think he will be a very decent player. 

[volpeazzurro]

21 minutes ago, Danny Clender said:

Agreed, fair assessment. 

Vardy definitely starts, which remains the original sentiment.

Firminho's scoring figures have been discussed to death, so unsure of that question.

If Under gets a good start, Perez is definitely a bencher, but could it actually help everyone out in the long run if Perez finds his spot?

 

 

Just personally,  I now think that Perez and Gray are surplus to requirements. If we could raise 20m from their sale and put it towards another striker like Jovic or Edouard I would think that to be decent business. I'm working on the premise that Perez cost us 16m as opposed to the 30m we originally thought, Edouard cost of 30m,  but I've absolutely no idea of Jovics value. 

[Webbo]

Perez doesn't contribute enough, I wouldn't argue with that, but I don't think he's a bad player. Worth hanging onto as a squad player.

[Winchesterfox]

A skilful player who underperformed last season. Only scored seven, all but one against bottom half teams  Got pushed off the ball too easily.  Not convinced about his work rate or ability to impose himself on games.  Not sure why he was better at Newcastle.   

[coolhandfox]

2 hours ago, Winchesterfox said:

A skilful player who underperformed last season. Only scored seven, all but one against bottom half teams  Got pushed off the ball too easily.  Not convinced about his work rate or ability to impose himself on games.  Not sure why he was better at Newcastle.   

He got 8......

[foxinsocks]

3 hours ago, Winchesterfox said:

A skilful player who underperformed last season. Only scored seven, all but one against bottom half teams  Got pushed off the ball too easily.  Not convinced about his work rate or ability to impose himself on games.  Not sure why he was better at Newcastle.   

he needs to get tot he gym - look at he muscles on greenwood and rashford.

Edited 19 September 2020 by foxinsocks

[sylofox]

Anyone that wants Gray over this guy is pissed. Sotton 0 Leicester 9 would never have been.

[Leicester_Loyal]

Fine as a bench option or squad player, not good enough for a fully fit starting 11, but that's fine.

[NeilLCFC]

Gash. 

[mod hero]

Like playing with 10 men. When Chengo plays we will be much more balanced 

[Tuna]

Frustrating game, still a decent player though.

[adam]

Only reason he is playing is because we paid so much for him. No better than gray. Terrible signing.

[Onions]

We signed a ST, played him RM and people are moaning at him, rather than Rodgers. 

 

It’s not his position 

[Blanchflower78]

Needs to be a central striker, wide doesnt work.  Under will be a huge lift

[tetly]

I won’t give up on him yet.. but he is poo 

[NeilLCFC]

40 minutes ago, NeilLCFC said:

Gash. 

Ok I’ll take this back

[Babylon]

33 minutes ago, Onions said:

We signed a ST, played him RM and people are moaning at him, rather than Rodgers. 

 

It’s not his position 

He played wide at Newcastle just fine, but yes we don’t use him the same way which is just stupid.

[Nalis]

Too inconsistent and not good enough on enough occasions.

 

Fine as a squad player, lets hope Under is more dangerous more often.

[Col city fan]

1 hour ago, tetly said:

I won’t give up on him yet.. but he is poo 

 

So many people don’t appreciate how we look more organised going forward when Ayoze plays

[Unabomber]

Good today.

[Mark]

On 19/09/2020 at 17:30, Leicester_Loyal said:

Fine as a bench option or squad player, not good enough for a fully fit starting 11, but that's fine.

I often think the same but we were worse when he went off, I think positionally he must be doing something right which opens things up for the right back.

[SecretPro]

Very lightweight, gives the ball away a fair bit. Willing to give him a chance but If Ünder is a baller then his days may be numbered.

[tetly]

4 minutes ago, Col city fan said:

 

So many people don’t appreciate how we look more organised going forward when Ayoze plays

Surly he loses his place when the new guy is fit? I agree we looked better when he was on but he does frustrate. Maybe poo was harsh he is a good player but not as a wide player..

[KFS]

He’s now back up to Madders. Under’s spot now with Albrighton back up. 

[HighPeakFox]

But he'll be a great option off the bench, which is what we need.