Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Bit worrying for me. Pep has gone strikerless, so our 3 at the back will get pulled all over the place. 

 

Still, at least we're not trying to go toe-to-toe... 

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, RowlattsFox said:

3 at the back it is then, knew this was coming and reckon we'd have Ndidi in the back 3 if he wasn't injured. Amartey scares me, he's clumsy and a big danger of a penalty kick. 

 

Interesting if Barnes plays centrally, or Praet plays from the right. Decent options on bench for once though. 

In fairness... shakey said it was hard to get past him 

Edited by foxinsocks
Posted
Just now, Babylon said:

Let’s face it, it’ll be more like 5 at the back.

Gotta be because of how isolated our fullbacks were last time we played these.

  • Like 1
Posted

Amartey!!

 

Bloody hell, I love the guy but ****ing hell, I don't want to see him actually playing for us.

 

Hopefully he proves us all wrong and plays a blinder.

Posted
1 minute ago, Mark said:

He just can’t let three at the back go can he

there was no reason to change from the 4-1-4-1. Pre-lockdown we lost so many points because of tactical changes. Same again this year I guess

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Give the bloke a chance, plays normal formation, Foxestalk he's got no idea against the better teams.

 

Tries something else get, why is he changing formation. 

Edited by coolhandfox
  • Like 2
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...