Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
davieG

The "do they mean us?" thread pt 3

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Yes said:

On Sky I assume, can’t stand the “big 6” love in, by contrast today thought the BBC gave us some decent coverage before the game which was nice to see, wasn’t all about Man United.

Felt the coverage was good and knowledgeable for once 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Sunbury Fox said:

According to Jamie Redknapp just now, Tottenham only have 1 tricky game left against Man U, all the other games including "at Leicester" are ones that they should be winning.

Nah, he’s right  - we will be comfortable in second place and preparing for a cup final .........playing the kids ......  

Edited by st albans fox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Sunbury Fox said:

According to Jamie Redknapp just now, Tottenham only have 1 tricky game left against Man U, all the other games including "at Leicester" are ones that they should be winning.

He's such a simpleton, dont understand how he's been a pundit for so long.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dion played for both clubs, but will always be a Cambridge United legend! Seriously though it’s just nice to see to local lads on the beeb along with shearer who despite booting Lennon in the face ain’t too bad a lad and at least doesn’t have a hard on for the “big” 6. I imagine sky won’t be covering the FA cup now as Man U and pool aren’t in it anymore. Pass the black armbands around please. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, The whole world smiles said:

They were always gonna with 2 Leicester lads in the gantry. 

 

15 minutes ago, Webbo said:

I seem to remember Dion being a Man U fan. 

 

I remember him getting sent off on his debut for us, against West Ham, after about half an hour.

 

No doubt he has a soft spot for us, but he was shite as a player.

 

In fairness, it was at the end of his career and we were signing the wrong players. 

 

Eg: Martin Keown.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tom27111 said:

 

 

I remember him getting sent off on his debut for us, against West Ham, after about half an hour.

 

No doubt he has a soft spot for us, but he was shite as a player.

 

In fairness, it was at the end of his career and we were signing the wrong players. 

 

Eg: Martin Keown.

He was pants for us but he did score a cracker at Rotherham on the volley about 30 yards out and then scored the winner at charlton in the cup what was amazing at that time. Unbelievable how far we’ve come when you think how big a moment that was. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, tom27111 said:

 

 

I remember him getting sent off on his debut for us, against West Ham, after about half an hour.

 

No doubt he has a soft spot for us, but he was shite as a player.

 

In fairness, it was at the end of his career and we were signing the wrong players. 

 

Eg: Martin Keown.

I thought it was against Cov. Must be my memory letting me down ... again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably should be in a Do They Mean Tielesmans Thread.

 

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/man-utd-leicester-youri-tielemans-20225275

 

Manchester United transfer mistake saw them embarrassed by Leicester City midfield
The Man Utd midfield was outclassed by Leicester City in the FA Cup quarter-final and it exposed mistakes made in recruitment at Old Trafford.


Tyrone Marshall
ByTyrone Marshall
07:00, 22 MAR 2021
 

United's midfield was taught a lesson by Youri Tielemans (Image: 2021 The FA)

When Manchester United were consumed by the Paul Pogba transfer saga in the summer of 2019, Youri Tielemans was a name mentioned as a possible replacement for the World Cup winner.

The Belgian had just spent six months on loan at Leicester City from Monaco and he’d shown he could cut it in the Premier League. He’d have been a welcome addition to any team in the division.


In the end Pogba remained at United and the uncertainty over his future remains as big an issue now as it was nearly two years ago. Tielemans, then 22, had been happy with life at the King Power Stadium and he made his move permanent for £35million, the same fee United paid for Donny van de Beek last summer. Right now one of those looks like a steal and the other is beginning to seem a questionable use of resources at a financially constrained time.

But the comparison with Van de Beek, beyond their transfer fee, is a red herring. It’s in a deeper role where Tielemans does his best work and where he would walk into this United team.

The battle between Tielemans and Wilfried Ndidi, in the blue corner, and Fred and Nemanja Matic, in the red corner, was as one-sided as the rest of the contest. For United this was like sending two lightweights into a heavyweight title fight.


The three-year contract handed to Matic, 32, nine months ago is beginning to look like another error of judgement at United, but the balance of the midfield, in general, is all wrong. While Leicester had a natural defensive midfielder in Ndidi and a passer capable of breaking lines and breaking forward in Tielemans, United don’t. Matic, Fred and Scott McTominay all prefer the defensive side. McTominay can at least offer well-timed runs into the final third, but a combination of Matic and Fred leaves United short of creative passing options.

 

That midfield set-up is something you would expect of a team in the bottom half of the Premier League, not one with ambitions of winning the Premier League and the Champions League. It was ruthlessly exposed by Tielemans, in particular.

He ghosted away from a flat-footed Matic after a sharp one-two with Kelechi Iheanacho in the lead up to his crucial goal and then remained socially distanced from Fred, who didn’t do enough to get near him. The finish was smart and the goal decisive, but Tielemans’ crisp and creative passing was an asset for Leicester all night, regularly finding Iheanacho, Ayoze Perez and Jamie Vardy in dangerous positions.

United had nobody who could offer the same threat and razor-sharp cutting edge from deep and when the changes came just after the hour mark they failed to fix the obvious problem in midfield. It was an opportunity to drop Van de Beek into a deeper role and introduce Bruno Fernandes further forward. Instead, Matic went off and McTominay came on, while somehow Fred remained on. It was rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic and it was no surprise the ship sank when Leicester killed the quarter-final off.


Ole Gunnar Solskjaer had a point when he raised the demanding schedule United have had recently and how much that has taken out of them, but the paucity of play in midfield is not a new problem.


Since Pogba’s injury against Everton in the first week of February United have gone into every game with a midfield axis of two of Fred, Matic and McTominay. It’s just not adventurous enough and for all the talk of progress this season, of which there has been plenty, it’s still hard to comprehend such a cautious midfield set-up taking United and Solskjaer to where they want to go. The game at the very top level now is dominated by the adventurous. It's time to be brave and bold and that means abandoning a midfield more suited to defence than attack.

They need a better passer in one of those deeper roles in a 4-2-3-1. Without it this is a team relying on Fernandes or a moment of magic in the front three. That’s not sustainable.

At £35million Tielemans would have been perfect. He’d still be perfect now, but Leicester’s sharp recruitment left United in the shade and in this quarter-final they paid the price for that on the pitch.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LCFCCHRIS said:

Regarding Ndidi

How deluded are these clowns? So used to chucking money at things they just expect it. Also, we play hard ball so well on transfers these days, so good luck getting him for less that 80 million. Even then I wouldn't sell.

 

IMG_20210322_101204.jpg

I'd be sick if we sold him for the same amount as the human wardrobe we flogged them 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LCFCCHRIS said:

Regarding Ndidi

How deluded are these clowns? So used to chucking money at things they just expect it. Also, we play hard ball so well on transfers these days, so good luck getting him for less that 80 million. Even then I wouldn't sell.

 

IMG_20210322_101204.jpg

Yeah it we're going on 'Maguires' a a currency he's worth at least two or three 😁. Things like this make me even happier to be a Leicester fan though. Competing with these idiots whilst doing it for a fraction of the price. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, LCFCCHRIS said:

Regarding Ndidi

How deluded are these clowns? So used to chucking money at things they just expect it. Also, we play hard ball so well on transfers these days, so good luck getting him for less that 80 million. Even then I wouldn't sell.

 

IMG_20210322_101204.jpg

This is the problem with a lot of big clubs and the mentality of their fans. Throw enough money at clubs and players and they think they'll just sign right there and then. 

 

Rodgers mentioned in the interview with Lineker on Saturday, when recruitment was brought up, that we look for a certain profile of player. A lot of bigger clubs don't do this and their fans think that money solves all of the issues. So unless you're Man City and you can throw enough money around anyone because the proverbial shit (read: class players) will stick, then it won't always work for clubs like Man Utd or Arsenal or Spurs. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...