jammie82uk Posted 17 October 2020 Posted 17 October 2020 What? How? Just watched them draw the lines and Looked clearly onside
Arkie Bennett Posted 17 October 2020 Posted 17 October 2020 That looked onside, but I have no sympathy for Liverpool after all the dubious decisions they benefited from last season. 3
Fox92 Posted 17 October 2020 Posted 17 October 2020 Just now, Kingleicester said: It’s about time Liverpool had VAR against them 2 in 1 then because the Pickford challenge, VVD looked onside.
trabuch Posted 17 October 2020 Posted 17 October 2020 Does the VAR get paid? If so, does anyone know how much they get paid for ruining football? 1
Countryfox Posted 17 October 2020 Posted 17 October 2020 2 minutes ago, rachhere said: Who was on VAR again? Having a mare today. Just now, UniFox21 said: David Coote As in blind as a ... Or is it bald as a ... 2
foxes_rule1978 Posted 17 October 2020 Posted 17 October 2020 Pickford lucky twice, should have been off and should have conceded a weak goal at the end
Stephen Hughes Posted 17 October 2020 Posted 17 October 2020 At least the VAR favours the big team argument may have taken a hit
KingsX Posted 17 October 2020 Posted 17 October 2020 Anybody remember when you'd say "wow, that match had everything" for what happened ON the pitch? 2
The Bear Posted 17 October 2020 Posted 17 October 2020 We had one of those nose-hair offsides against us at Anfield last season so meh, what goes around comes around. His shoulder was just offside.
cambridgefox Posted 17 October 2020 Posted 17 October 2020 4 minutes ago, Kingleicester said: It’s about time Liverpool had VAR against them 3 minutes ago, Arkie Bennett said: That looked onside, but I have no sympathy for Liverpool after all the dubious decisions they benefited from last season. Not Liverpool fan,but wasn’t the case.
Dan Posted 17 October 2020 Posted 17 October 2020 I just can't believe we legitimised this absolute rubbish. It's ****ing ruining the game. 1
UniFox21 Posted 17 October 2020 Posted 17 October 2020 "Benefit of the doubt" rule was so open to interpretation and bias, makes sense big club players want it back.
kingfox Posted 17 October 2020 Posted 17 October 2020 Football is slowly dying more and more as the weeks pass. If it’s going to be like this, then keep stadiums closed forever.
st albans fox Posted 17 October 2020 Posted 17 October 2020 It’s funny how changes on one law have a knock on effect elsewhere in order to remove the upper arm issue with unintentional handballs on goals being scored (ref Chris wood against us) that t shirt area becomes live as far as goal scoring is concerned - hence it probably means that even the elbow can be often be offside where a player is standing fairly upright at the moment the forward pass is struck ......... gonna see a few ‘good goals’ ruled out by var from now on ... 1
ealingfox Posted 17 October 2020 Posted 17 October 2020 The problem isn't that it's a nose-hair offside. I actually don't have a problem with those ones. The problem is that it's not offside full stop. Look at the stills of that ffs, state of those lines. 2
Corky Posted 17 October 2020 Posted 17 October 2020 Which part of him that he can score with is offside? 1
Jattdogg Posted 17 October 2020 Posted 17 October 2020 Just now, Corky said: Which part of him that he can score with is offside? He farted at that exact moment causing his shorts to flare at the back crack which put him offside
jammie82uk Posted 17 October 2020 Posted 17 October 2020 Just now, Corky said: Which part of him that he can score with is offside? Shoulder apparently due to the new handball rule
martyn Posted 17 October 2020 Posted 17 October 2020 (edited) We've had hairline calls like that since the start of last season, why all the talk about the game being finished now? Is that the first VAR call to cost Liverpool points? Edited 17 October 2020 by martyn 2
UniFox21 Posted 17 October 2020 Posted 17 October 2020 2 minutes ago, ealingfox said: The problem isn't that it's a nose-hair offside. I actually don't have a problem with those ones. The problem is that it's not offside full stop. Look at the stills of that ffs, state of those lines. 1 minute ago, Corky said: Which part of him that he can score with is offside? Angle they've given us doesn't do any favours at all
ARTY_FOX Posted 17 October 2020 Posted 17 October 2020 People complain about laws that can be interpreted in different ways but offside is about the only black and white rule. Offside is offside for me. Wouldnt be mad if that was against us and would be if it wasn't given against a team we were playing I mean before this was bought in and people would have a toe off people were moaning about linesman needing help for literally this tight of a call.
sdb Posted 17 October 2020 Posted 17 October 2020 3 minutes ago, ealingfox said: The problem isn't that it's a nose-hair offside. I actually don't have a problem with those ones. The problem is that it's not offside full stop. Look at the stills of that ffs, state of those lines. Madness. Something genuinely dubious about VAR today.
ARTY_FOX Posted 17 October 2020 Posted 17 October 2020 3 minutes ago, Corky said: Which part of him that he can score with is offside? I guess if you're going with the T-shirt line that they've implemented then that part of his arm?
Recommended Posts