Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Daggers

What grinds my gears...

By Daggers, in General Chat

Recommended Posts

Izzy

Izzy

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Saxondale said:

Who are these dicks that park-up on motorway overbridges?

The Police :thumbup:

ajthefox

ajthefox

Posted
Posted

Some sanctimonious bint took great pleasure in shouting at me from the pavement to tell me there was "no light, no light" on my bike today on my ride home and will no doubt hold me in contempt with dangerous cyclists everywhere.


Nevermind the fact that there was a front light on my bike which has built in rechargeable battery that unfortunately ran out on my journey, a two way light on my helmet, a rear light, a reflective high vis coat and a reflective high vis bag cover. 

 

I understand the issue as a cyclist and a motorist but if she wasn't clearly so hateful of cyclists, she might've actually stopped to wonder why I didn't have a light on my front but was otherwise very visible.

murphy

murphy

Posted
Posted (edited)
39 minutes ago, ajthefox said:

Some sanctimonious bint took great pleasure in shouting at me from the pavement to tell me there was "no light, no light" on my bike today on my ride home and will no doubt hold me in contempt with dangerous cyclists everywhere.


Nevermind the fact that there was a front light on my bike which has built in rechargeable battery that unfortunately ran out on my journey, a two way light on my helmet, a rear light, a reflective high vis coat and a reflective high vis bag cover. 

 

I understand the issue as a cyclist and a motorist but if she wasn't clearly so hateful of cyclists, she might've actually stopped to wonder why I didn't have a light on my front but was otherwise very visible.

 

That reminds me - cyclists!   Bloomin cyclists grind my gears, farting about on their toys that they should've grown out of, clogging up the roads and paying no tax.  

 

And why do those Sunday leisure cyclists have to get dressed up like Lance Armstrong to toddle along for a few miles.  I don't wanna see your skinny arses in lycra, double file, when I'm trying to overtake.

 

Bloomin menace they are and don't get me started on those that don't have rear lights....

 

 

 

Edited by murphy
  • Popular Post
Beliall

Beliall

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
1 hour ago, ajthefox said:

Some sanctimonious bint took great pleasure in shouting at me from the pavement to tell me there was "no light, no light" on my bike today on my ride home and will no doubt hold me in contempt with dangerous cyclists everywhere.


Nevermind the fact that there was a front light on my bike which has built in rechargeable battery that unfortunately ran out on my journey, a two way light on my helmet, a rear light, a reflective high vis coat and a reflective high vis bag cover. 

 

I understand the issue as a cyclist and a motorist but if she wasn't clearly so hateful of cyclists, she might've actually stopped to wonder why I didn't have a light on my front but was otherwise very visible.

you must look a right bellend

  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
Julian Joachim Jr Shabadoo

Julian Joachim Jr Shabadoo

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, Mark 'expert' Lawrenson said:

Just seen a build your own Terminator magazine advertised 120 issues at £8.99 each ? that’s a whopping £1078! Has anyone ever built anything from these magazines? Ridiculous.

 

Yeah but it actually time travels and kills people and stuff, that's pretty good value if you think about it

  • Haha 1
Free Falling Foxes

Free Falling Foxes

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, murphy said:

 

That reminds me - cyclists!   Bloomin cyclists grind my gears, farting about on their toys that they should've grown out of, clogging up the roads and paying no tax.  

 

And why do those Sunday leisure cyclists have to get dressed up like Lance Armstrong to toddle along for a few miles.  I don't wanna see your skinny arses in lycra, double file, when I'm trying to overtake.

 

Bloomin menace they are and don't get me started on those that don't have rear lights....

 

 

 

Are you still paying road tax?


More fool you. It was abolshed in 1937.

  • Like 1
Strokes

Strokes

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Julian Joachim Jr Shabadoo said:

 

Yeah but it actually time travels and kills people and stuff, that's pretty good value if you think about it

Yeah when your done you can send it to get your money back. Great investment.

Danizen

Danizen

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, ealingfox said:

People describing the varying central midfield roles with shirt numbers.

 

Number 6 and number 8 are not playing positions. This isn't rugby.

That's always confused me since I always think of No.6 as a CB. 

oakman

oakman

Posted
Posted

People being described as 'hero', 'legend' and 'inspirational' etc. for doing the most inane, unremarkable things.

 

Just read something about Jess Glynn being 'inspirational' for taking her make-up off at the Brit Awards. People are certainly easily inspired these days.

Nalis

Nalis

Posted
Posted

I can feel a debate guys lol

 

There is no right or wrong answer but to me, the classic 1-11 is....

 

1 - GK

2 - RB

3 - LB

4 - CM (defence minded midfielder)

5 - CB

6 - CB

7 - RM

8 - CM (attack minded midfielder)

9 - CF

10 - CF (second striker)

11 - LM

  • Like 2
bovril

bovril

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Nalis said:

I can feel a debate guys lol

 

There is no right or wrong answer but to me, the classic 1-11 is....

 

1 - GK

2 - RB

3 - LB

4 - CM (defence minded midfielder)

5 - CB

6 - CB

7 - RM

8 - CM (attack minded midfielder)

9 - CF

10 - CF (second striker)

11 - LM

Pretty much spot on, although I think you could substitute 8 and 10. Lots of great 10 midfielders, and some number 8 strikers. 

Edited by bovril
Jattdogg

Jattdogg

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Nalis said:

I can feel a debate guys lol

 

There is no right or wrong answer but to me, the classic 1-11 is....

 

1 - kante

2 - kante

3 - kante

4 - kante

5 - kante

6 - kante

7 - kante

8 - kante

9 - kante

10 - kante

11 - kante

Fixed.

  • Haha 1
Alf Bentley

Alf Bentley

Posted
Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, Nalis said:

I can feel a debate guys lol

 

There is no right or wrong answer but to me, the classic 1-11 is....

 

1 - GK

2 - RB

3 - LB

4 - CM (defence minded midfielder)

5 - CB

6 - CB

7 - RM

8 - CM (attack minded midfielder)

9 - CF

10 - CF (second striker)

11 - LM

 

As a kid first getting into football c. 1970, I learned the classic 2-3-5 formation. Players always had the number appropriate to their position, as I recall - and certainly no names on their backs, sponsorship names/logos, squad numbers or any of that newfangled crap! :D

 

1- Goalkeeper

2- Right full back

3- Left full back

4- Right halfback / Right half

5- Centre halfback / Centre half

6- Left halfback / Left half

7- Right winger

8- Right inside forward / Inside right

9- Centre forward

10- Left inside forward / Inside left

11- Left winger

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formation_(association_football)#2–3–5_(Pyramid)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formation_(association_football)#Metodo_(2–3–2–3)

 

Edited by Alf Bentley
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Carl the Llama

Carl the Llama

Posted
Posted

A bit unorthodox but whenever I'm running an FM save I'll aim for the aesthetically pleasing lineup of:

 

1 - GK

2 - LB

3 - LCB

4 - RCB

5 - RB

6 - LM

7 - LCM

8 - RCM

9 - RM

10 - LCF

11 - RCF

 

Or the ascending L-R equivalent depending on the formation I'm trying to get my team to use.

StanSP

StanSP

Posted
Posted

That team number debate. This is the correct version...

 

1 - Goal-keeper

2 - Right-back

3 - Left-back

4 & 5 - Centre-backs

6 - defensive-minded midfielder

7 - Right winger

8 - forward-minded midfielder

9 & 10 - Strikers

11 - Left winger

 

 

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...