UniFox21 Posted 14 February 2020 Posted 14 February 2020 1 minute ago, The Bear said: We always get ****ed over by VAR though, and you lot usually come up smelling of roses! Mate don't even start on this one, I'm still fuming from the Villa non penalty that cost us a Wembley day out. You lot have had a fair amount of shit luck though
st albans fox Posted 14 February 2020 Posted 14 February 2020 4 minutes ago, TK95 said: Let's not analyse anything else BT. VAR Good - they’d be saying how turd we are .......
Ted Maul Posted 14 February 2020 Posted 14 February 2020 1 minute ago, Gazza M said: The sort of team we used to love playing against. Spot on. When we're on it, we're brilliant. When we're not, we can be easily bullied. We're a young side though, hopefully the mentality will catch up with the ability in time.
The Horse's Mouth Posted 14 February 2020 Posted 14 February 2020 2 minutes ago, The Bear said: Spot on. Technology is ruining perfectly good goals because the laws aren't fit to support it. Handball rules included. We always get ****ed over by VAR though, and you lot usually come up smelling of roses! Hahahaha get a grip
gurru991 Posted 14 February 2020 Posted 14 February 2020 2 minutes ago, Sunbury Fox said: We are probably the shortest team in the league, so it's no surprise. Without Wilf we are even more vulnerable. Benkovic can help solve that problem
Corky Posted 14 February 2020 Posted 14 February 2020 2 minutes ago, The Bear said: Spot on. Technology is ruining perfectly good goals because the laws aren't fit to support it. Handball rules included. We always get ****ed over by VAR though, and you lot usually come up smelling of roses! Blame your club mate, we all voted for this. This was all agreed to at the start of the season.
Leeds Fox Posted 14 February 2020 Posted 14 February 2020 1 minute ago, The Bear said: Spot on. Technology is ruining perfectly good goals because the laws aren't fit to support it. Handball rules included. We always get ****ed over by VAR though, and you lot usually come up smelling of roses! Hardly getting f***ed over there, he was offside. Tight maybe, but it wasn’t like it was an incorrect decision.
Finnegan Posted 14 February 2020 Posted 14 February 2020 14 minutes ago, ttfn said: The refereeing might be better but I’m not sure the football is. We look just as devoid of ideas at the moment as we did a year ago. Teams have worked out we've got no creativity out wide. I'm positive, I think we've made huge strides as a team but we clearly need more quality recruitment in the final third. We need creativity around the park so that the whole strain isn't on Maddison and YT down the middle of the park. Barnes and Perez have done very little. We want to play football like Man City but Man City have fantastic wide players that can create something out of nothing.
Beechey Posted 14 February 2020 Posted 14 February 2020 1 minute ago, Charl91 said: Our attacking play is so predictable. Option one: Pass to Ricardo. Ricardo runs up the pitch and tries to play a 1 - 2 with Perez. Perez loses the ball Wolves have a dangerous counter attack. Option two: Pass to Tielemans Tielemans hangs on the ball too long / messes up a pass and loses it. Wolves have a dangerous counter attack. Option three: Pass to Chilwell. Chilwell to Barnes. Barnes runs up the pitch and either A) falls over, B) Turns around and passes it back to a defender. If A) Leicester get a semi-decent chance from a header, before a dangerous wolves counter attack. if B) See option one and option two again. Notice how Maddison and Vardy aren't included in any of these options - that's because they don't touch the ball. It's frustrating really. Seeing the same patterns of play again and again - which would be fine if it looked like we might get any tiny amount of success from them, but at no point has there really been anything resembling a dangerous attack. Feel like Ricardo is our most dangerous attacker at the moment, which is ridiculous really. It’s because the centre of the pitch for Wolves has a combined 8 players there.
Vacamion Posted 14 February 2020 Posted 14 February 2020 Given this VAR development, I now really really hope that we shithouse this 1-0 off Soyuncu's backside in the 89th min, for the benefit of that idiot Wolves fan whose posts I block. COYB.
SouthStandUpperTier Posted 14 February 2020 Posted 14 February 2020 1 minute ago, The Bear said: Spot on. Technology is ruining perfectly good goals because the laws aren't fit to support it. Handball rules included. We always get ****ed over by VAR though, and you lot usually come up smelling of roses!
Suzie the Fox Posted 14 February 2020 Posted 14 February 2020 2 minutes ago, The Bear said: Spot on. Technology is ruining perfectly good goals because the laws aren't fit to support it. Handball rules included. We always get ****ed over by VAR though, and you lot usually come up smelling of roses! Well it is Valentines day
ozleicester Posted 14 February 2020 Posted 14 February 2020 how can you support VAR then complain about it so fvfking much... he was OFF!
Free Falling Foxes Posted 14 February 2020 Posted 14 February 2020 If the weather forecast is correct, this might be the only game to survive the weekend. Could be the full 90 minute highlights on MOTD tomorrow. Hope not.
Brooksy Posted 14 February 2020 Posted 14 February 2020 4 minutes ago, The Bear said: Spot on. Technology is ruining perfectly good goals because the laws aren't fit to support it. Handball rules included. We always get ****ed over by VAR though, and you lot usually come up smelling of roses! Why are you on a Leicester forum during the game. Genuine question
vanity Posted 14 February 2020 Posted 14 February 2020 I do wonder if we are a bit less effective as an attacking side with Vards out there. Not bc of anything he does or doesn't do, but bc the team is so focused on getting him the ball, which makes us easier to defend. Sometimes when he is out of the game it appears to me that our attack is more dynamic and unpredictable, because we have a collection of equals looking to score rather than a main man to feed the ball to, which stresses the defense and gets us better shots. I'd really like to see Iheanacho brought on at the half. We are simply too basic and easy to defend right now.
Countryfox Posted 14 February 2020 Posted 14 February 2020 C’mon we ain’t a bad team and they are very strong ... all to play for ..
l444ry Posted 14 February 2020 Posted 14 February 2020 6 minutes ago, Chester Dontlie said: Hear hear. I have a feeling 4 4 2 could save our arses today Maybe but don't forget that 3-5-2 became popular in the 1990's as an antidote to 4-4-2.
leicesterseddon Posted 14 February 2020 Posted 14 February 2020 Can’t see what the scandal is. The officials made the correct decision, using the technology available to them. Yes it’s pedantic but ultimately that’s what VAR is. It’s what the clubs have voted for. Hysterical to see all the TV pundits laying into VAR - the only reason we have this bloody thing is because they pushed for it over years. Fans certainly didn’t.
Finnegan Posted 14 February 2020 Posted 14 February 2020 4 minutes ago, The Bear said: Spot on. Technology is ruining perfectly good goals because the laws aren't fit to support it. Handball rules included. We always get ****ed over by VAR though, and you lot usually come up smelling of roses! How is it a perfectly good goal if he's genuinely offside? Sorry mate but he was off its not a goal.
Charl91 Posted 14 February 2020 Posted 14 February 2020 1 minute ago, Beechey said: It’s because the centre of the pitch for Wolves has a combined 8 players there. It does, but that's probably because they know if they force us wide then we're useless.
The Horse's Mouth Posted 14 February 2020 Posted 14 February 2020 Elvis hammond getting a mention on bt got to love it
jonny_wright Posted 14 February 2020 Posted 14 February 2020 This is proof we need a plan B, we can’t switch it up! No presence up front or a guy to bring other players into play
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.