Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, em9999 said:

They are cheats and this is about time 

 

 

They should be stripped of anything they have won 

It’s Man City. Small fine and a slap on the wrist 

Posted
1 minute ago, Pita said:

It’s Man City. Small fine and a slap on the wrist 

Not for this its impossible 

 

They are so many charges a slap on the wrist wont happen it's clear to see

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, em9999 said:

Not for this its impossible 

 

They are so many charges a slap on the wrist wont happen it's clear to see

 

 

Chelsea got away with a small fine. 

Posted
The charges against Manchester City spanned a nine-year period from 2009 to 2018. The independent commission ruled against the club across four major operational categories: [1, 2]
  • Financial Misrepresentation (54 counts): Failing to provide a "true and fair view" of the club’s financial position. The league proved that City artificially inflated income by disguising direct funding from their Abu Dhabi-based owners as legitimate third-party commercial sponsorship revenue. [1, 2]
  • Concealed Compensation (14 counts): Failing to fully disclose executive and player remuneration. This notably included secret off-the-books salary structures, such as secondary contracts routed to former manager Roberto Mancini. [1, 2, 3, 4]
  • Non-Cooperation (35 counts): Systematically refusing to cooperate with the Premier League’s investigation between 2018 and 2023, including withholding vital internal emails and documents. [1, 2]
  • Regulatory Breaches (11 counts): Violating UEFA’s Financial Fair Play (FFP) regulations (5 counts) and the Premier League's own Profitability and Sustainability Rules (7 counts). [1]
City was reportedly acquitted on only one single charge out of the original 115 brought forward.
Posted
6 minutes ago, Stadt said:

If we finished 4th instead of 5th we would have dished out MORE unsustainable contracts on shit players and breached FFP by a greater distance. We’ve seen what Top’s LCFC do, an extra £50m in revenue would not have helped us an iota.

Our owners being shit shouldn't dismiss the fact that we've been repeatedly cheated out of our success for the last six years straight. 

  • Like 4
Posted

They'll appeal it, the PL will back down on some charges. Man City appeal again, the PL will settle on a further reduction. 

 

5 years passes, by which time nobody cna be fvcked any more because football itself has imploded and nobody has energy left. Meanwhile, Leicester languish in National League North and Rudkin is still heading up the club. 

Posted (edited)

Slap on the wrist and suspend punishment is they do it again.

 

They will escape the punishment they should have.

 

7 breaches of P & S, come on PL hound them in the same way you did Everton, Forest and us.

 

 

Edited by coolhandfox
Posted
12 minutes ago, em9999 said:
The charges against Manchester City spanned a nine-year period from 2009 to 2018. The independent commission ruled against the club across four major operational categories: [1, 2]
  • Financial Misrepresentation (54 counts): Failing to provide a "true and fair view" of the club’s financial position. The league proved that City artificially inflated income by disguising direct funding from their Abu Dhabi-based owners as legitimate third-party commercial sponsorship revenue. [1, 2]
  • Concealed Compensation (14 counts): Failing to fully disclose executive and player remuneration. This notably included secret off-the-books salary structures, such as secondary contracts routed to former manager Roberto Mancini. [1, 2, 3, 4]
  • Non-Cooperation (35 counts): Systematically refusing to cooperate with the Premier League’s investigation between 2018 and 2023, including withholding vital internal emails and documents. [1, 2]
  • Regulatory Breaches (11 counts): Violating UEFA’s Financial Fair Play (FFP) regulations (5 counts) and the Premier League's own Profitability and Sustainability Rules (7 counts). [1]
City was reportedly acquitted on only one single charge out of the original 115 brought forward.

And people not giving them any credit for not being guilty for that one charge. Typical anti Man City bias on full display.

Posted

Perhaps if they hadn’t of cheated we would have finished 4th two seasons running and this slide into ignominy wouldn’t have occurred. I mean, big IF, but these are the calculations teams will be making. 
 

Severe punishment for Man City could open a can of worms the EPL aren’t ready to deal with. 
 

personally I think they could face a 50pt deduction or even an instant relegation. Doubt anything will happen this season though. Appeal, then appealing the appeal decision. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, Stadt said:

If we finished 4th instead of 5th we would have dished out MORE unsustainable contracts on shit players and breached FFP by a greater distance. We’ve seen what Top’s LCFC do, an extra £50m in revenue would not have helped us an iota.

It has a massive impact on the UEFA FFP regulations we were governed by finishing 5th instead of 4th.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
Just now, ARM1968 said:

Perhaps if they hadn’t of cheated we would have finished 4th two seasons running and this slide into ignominy wouldn’t have occurred. I mean, big IF, but these are the calculations teams will be making. 
 

Severe punishment for Man City could open a can of worms the EPL aren’t ready to deal with. 
 

personally I think they could face a 50pt deduction or even an instant relegation. Doubt anything will happen this season though. Appeal, then appealing the appeal decision. 

It's not an 'if'. 

 

These are the same charges UEFA banned them from Europe for two seasons for. 5th should have qualified for the Champions League in both those two seasons. 

Posted
Just now, LcFc_Smiv said:

It has a massive impact on the UEFA FFP regulations we were governed by finishing 5th instead of 4th.

Not only would we have been better able to comply with PSR in 22/23, which is the season we were relegated by the Premier League's delayed pts deduction for Everton, we wouldn't even have been in the Championship in 23/24 for which we were retroactively charged under rules that didn't exist at the time and wouldn't have been relegated to League One. 

 

Literally NONE of the relegations we've suffered in the last 4 seasons would have happened. 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, ARM1968 said:

Perhaps if they hadn’t of cheated we would have finished 4th two seasons running and this slide into ignominy wouldn’t have occurred. I mean, big IF, but these are the calculations teams will be making. 
 

Severe punishment for Man City could open a can of worms the EPL aren’t ready to deal with. 
 

personally I think they could face a 50pt deduction or even an instant relegation. Doubt anything will happen this season though. Appeal, then appealing the appeal decision. 

Would get very spicy if the EFL refuse to admit them until all charges are addressed, considering there are numerous clubs in their structure (us obviously included) with direct grievances.

 

I mean they wouldn't, the EFL would LOVE a cash cow like Man City, and probably push for them to start in League Two or something to maximise their time in their jurisdiction. But there does remain the slim possibility that they're booted out of the professional football leagues entirely.

Posted (edited)

There’s no doubt they should be relegated, it’s not even a debate. But that should have been the case after the Super League as well.

 

Unfortunately, we’re about to be reminded what modern football really is. It is not a sport held together by a set of rules to maintain meaning and integrity, that’s for sure.

Edited by Kitchandro
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...