Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

the year they were ejected from europe with a 2 year banm but appealed and CAS overturned pending this review was......Feb 20. So we would have been in the Champs League 2 years running from 20/21 to 20/22 and the subsequent financial unravellings due to lack of income / FFP balance would have played out exactly in the way that it did. Our investment would have delivered the required financial payback in Champs Lge revenues.. Their cheating and appeal, staving off the consequences of a european ban, has directly led to the financial downfall of our club IMO. It may not hold in a court of law. But very simply, take them out of europe in 20/21 and 20/22 and we get circa £100m more each year in revenue. How much did we miss FFP by each year? less than that.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Brizzle Fox said:

I might be wrong but don't the charges against them only go up to 2018?

We should comfortably be able to argue legacy benefit, in any case any punishment for 2018 would have likely been applied in the 2019/20 season.
 

Any appeal would have to be on the basis of evidence now available that wasn’t at the time of the hearing or some sort of abuse of process.

 

Haaland’s 9 year contract is a potential millstone if they are in the National League next season. 😂

Posted
4 minutes ago, FosseSpark said:

the year they were ejected from europe with a 2 year banm but appealed and CAS overturned pending this review was......Feb 20. So we would have been in the Champs League 2 years running from 20/21 to 20/22 and the subsequent financial unravellings due to lack of income / FFP balance would have played out exactly in the way that it did. Our investment would have delivered the required financial payback in Champs Lge revenues.. Their cheating and appeal, staving off the consequences of a european ban, has directly led to the financial downfall of our club IMO. It may not hold in a court of law. But very simply, take them out of europe in 20/21 and 20/22 and we get circa £100m more each year in revenue. How much did we miss FFP by each year? less than that.

 

Which then opens up the argument that Leeds should be suing them not us.

 

This could certainly take years to fully unravel.

Posted
1 minute ago, Foxmeister said:

We should comfortably be able to argue legacy benefit, in any case any punishment for 2018 would have likely been applied in the 2019/20 season.
 

Any appeal would have to be on the basis of evidence now available that wasn’t at the time of the hearing or some sort of abuse of process.

 

Haaland’s 9 year contract is a potential millstone if they are in the National League next season. 😂

Yeah fair enough. This is going to be an absolute gold mine for the lawyers.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Brizzle Fox said:

I might be wrong but don't the charges against them only go up to 2018?

They do, but they're the same charges as the UEFA charges for which they were banned from Europe for those two seasons, and which got overturned for being "time barred" after they'd spent half a decade doing to UEFA pretty much what they've been doing to the Premier League. 

 

5th should have qualified for the Champions League in both of those two seasons. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Les-TA-Jon said:

Not really. They will appeal. And even then, no punishments have been decided. 


As is there right. 
 

come on mate 115 odd charges, it’s not going to be pretty is it. 
 

That said I should imagine some people won’t be happy unless they board are hung drawn and quartered down Oxford Road. 
 

 

Posted
Just now, Fish said:

They cheated and got unprecedented success . We cheated and went downhill , fast 🤷‍♂️

We didn't cheat. We were cheated. Repeatedly. By Man City, Chelsea, Everton, The Premier League and the EFL. 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Fish said:

They cheated and got unprecedented success . We cheated and went downhill , fast 🤷‍♂️


You have no idea if they are going to be stripped of all that success yet do you. 
 

And to be fair we cheated and got promoted it’s not the PL’s fault we were cheating and still managed to be shite apart from that little season. 
 

If we are going down the route of stripping them of titles we should be stripped of our championship trophy and our seasons PL money

, if we actually want fair, which we have not. 

Edited by Manwell Pablo
  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said:

We didn't cheat. We were cheated. Repeatedly. By Man City, Chelsea, Everton, The Premier League and the EFL. 

Hmmmm how did we get to the Premier League in the first place?

  • Like 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, winteriscoming said:

Sky sports news must be in mourning as there’s nothing about it on there. 
They are probably negotiating non league live matches. 

Because the source is a leak to The Athletic, they are being legally careful 

Posted

I mean it is a good point that if (if) we have no breach of ffp when we finished fifth we do have a court case.

 

Probably can’t afford a lawyer like but we have a case 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Manwell Pablo said:


As is there right. 
 

come on mate 115 odd charges, it’s not going to be pretty is it. 
 

That said I should imagine some people won’t be happy unless they board are hung drawn and quartered down Oxford Road. 
 

 

Right? And you said 'Glad I won't have to hear about this anymore' and I said 'basically nothing has been decided yet, so yes you will still hear about it' 

Posted

How this plays out now is going to be interesting. This no doubt affects a lot of teams so if they go down the route of even just fines, surely there is going to numerous counter claims from all other clubs affected by missing out on Europe, relegation etc.

Posted
1 minute ago, Les-TA-Jon said:

Right? And you said 'Glad I won't have to hear about this anymore' and I said 'basically nothing has been decided yet, so yes you will still hear about it' 


I mean it’s a flippant remark made to piss people off that have been doing that not meant to be taken entirely literally. 

Posted (edited)

If you can make £4 on a pie, I make it that Man City will only need to sell 131,250 pies per week in the National League North to pay for the remainder of Haalands 9 year contract. 6,825,000 pies per year. 

Edited by FoxesWalk

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...