Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, rn9013 said:

The confidence of the Man City owner in his most recent statement makes me wonder what they’re planning. Wouldn’t surprise me if it’s overturned yet.

 

I have no doubt Man City are guilty, but money and geopolitics are at play and let’s face it they usually come out on top. 

They've got nothing. If they had it would have come out in the investigation.

 

Every statement they make is pure bluster.

 

They're done. 

Posted

Not really any point taking the titles away because going forward no one is going to take those achievements seriously anyway.
 

Essentially the pyramid has had over a decades worth of history robbed.

 

Nothing they achieved was done fairly 

Posted

Apparently to be kicked out there needs to be a vote with 15 teams agreeing to boot them out .

 

 

 

I think this is what happened in Scotland to Rangers when they got demoted down the leagues .

Posted
5 minutes ago, Super_horns said:

Apparently to be kicked out there needs to be a vote with 15 teams agreeing to boot them out .

 

 

 

I think this is what happened in Scotland to Rangers when they got demoted down the leagues .

Would clubs willingly give up matchday revenue by reducing the number of clubs?

Posted
4 hours ago, Foxdiamond said:

Oh yeah the outrageous fees we paid for Vardy, Albrighton, Huth, Mahrez etc really puts us on a par with Manchester City

Who said on a par?

 

We broke FFP rules in 2013/14. Permitted overspend was £8m and we reported an overspend by £20m.

 

Might have been more if not for King Power sponsorship deals, and while the Vichai era was a million times more professional than his son's, I wouldn't be shocked if those deals helped cook the books in our favour.

  • Like 3
Posted
6 hours ago, jammie82uk said:

550 pages submitted by the premier league covering the breaches 
 

The PL set out its case in a Statement of Charges (subsequently amended) and a Statement

of Facts. Together those documents (which ran to approximately 500 pages) set out

a) The 100+ breaches of the PL Rules alleged by the PL to have been committed by the

Club, and

b) The facts and matters on which the PL relied to support the Charges.

Section E of the Statement of Charges recorded that the PL regarded the Club’s conduct as

having involved ‘extremely serious, significant, sustained and intentional or reckless

breaches of rules critical to the proper and fair operation of the PL’s league competition’.

11) The PL’s Statement of Charges and Statement of Facts were subsequently supplemented

with an additional 50 pages of Further Information.

The Pepstein Files

  • Haha 2
Posted
21 minutes ago, Corky said:

Would clubs willingly give up matchday revenue by reducing the number of clubs?

For one game /season maybe with 4 teams getting promoted or only two going down ?

 

Anyways is probably months off that sort of thing happening.
 

 

 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Brizzle Fox said:

They've got nothing. If they had it would have come out in the investigation.

 

Every statement they make is pure bluster.

 

They're done. 

 

Agreed. It's the arrogance of the oil-rich "power families" of that region which are driving those over-confident statements. They've got so used to paying themselves out of trouble (and to throw cash to get whatever they want). 

 

Not going to wash here, though. Will be a rude awakening. 

 

 

 

Edited by HitchinFox
typo
Posted

This will go the way of the Chelsea Abramovich saga I’d imagine and they’ll be forced to sell the club, as they’ll not be deemed fit for purpose.

 

Also, I’m just waiting for someone to look at us and try and understand if BC Game is also “tagged money”, put in by King Power through the back door, as that is basically what Manchester City are being accused of. 
 

It still doesn’t alter my opinion though that they did this to compete with the likes of Liverpool, Manchester United and Arsenal, who themselves are allowed to spend money willy nilly, as historically they spent more to grow larger. 
 

On the face of it though, I’d suggest they’ve maybe broke UK law in being rather dodgy! So this will go criminal. 
 

Appealing to go to the High Court might make this worse for them!  

Posted
1 hour ago, Sly said:

This will go the way of the Chelsea Abramovich saga I’d imagine and they’ll be forced to sell the club, as they’ll not be deemed fit for purpose.

 

Also, I’m just waiting for someone to look at us and try and understand if BC Game is also “tagged money”, put in by King Power through the back door, as that is basically what Manchester City are being accused of. 
 

It still doesn’t alter my opinion though that they did this to compete with the likes of Liverpool, Manchester United and Arsenal, who themselves are allowed to spend money willy nilly, as historically they spent more to grow larger. 
 

On the face of it though, I’d suggest they’ve maybe broke UK law in being rather dodgy! So this will go criminal. 
 

Appealing to go to the High Court might make this worse for them!  

You can rightly argue that FFP is a nonsense designed to stop exactly this for of investment to the benefit of those larger clubs, but once the rules were in place they were obliged to follow them.

Posted

 

If it were up to me:

 

Strip titles and cups from them.

 

(but don't allocate those honours to the runners up, just leave them as blank)

 

EPL and EFL to work together and relegate them a few divisions, à la Juventus.

 

Fine them massively and give the money to grassroots football charities.

 

Make a PL / EFL rule that clubs can't litigate for supposedly lost earnings based on this sort of thing -  the governing bodies' sanctions need to be the end of the matter. 

 

But I doubt they'll do that stuff as they love the oil money, so I think it will be fines / points deductions and not relegation.

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
45 minutes ago, Vacamion said:

 

If it were up to me:

 

Strip titles and cups from them.

 

(but don't allocate those honours to the runners up, just leave them as blank)

 

EPL and EFL to work together and relegate them a few divisions, à la Juventus.

 

Fine them massively and give the money to grassroots football charities.

 

Make a PL / EFL rule that clubs can't litigate for supposedly lost earnings based on this sort of thing -  the governing bodies' sanctions need to be the end of the matter. 

 

But I doubt they'll do that stuff as they love the oil money, so I think it will be fines / points deductions and not relegation.

 

 

You have to remove the owners, nothing else is really a punishment.

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Super_horns said:

Apparently to be kicked out there needs to be a vote with 15 teams agreeing to boot them out .

 

 

 

I think this is what happened in Scotland to Rangers when they got demoted down the leagues .

To put this in context, it’s like Ric Flair being removed from Foxestalk because we found out he was responsible for every foamy end the self serving Pint Machines have thrown up for the last 4 years. 

  • Haha 3
Posted
4 hours ago, Sly said:

This will go the way of the Chelsea Abramovich saga I’d imagine and they’ll be forced to sell the club, as they’ll not be deemed fit for purpose.

 

Also, I’m just waiting for someone to look at us and try and understand if BC Game is also “tagged money”, put in by King Power through the back door, as that is basically what Manchester City are being accused of. 
 

It still doesn’t alter my opinion though that they did this to compete with the likes of Liverpool, Manchester United and Arsenal, who themselves are allowed to spend money willy nilly, as historically they spent more to grow larger. 
 

On the face of it though, I’d suggest they’ve maybe broke UK law in being rather dodgy! So this will go criminal. 
 

Appealing to go to the High Court might make this worse for them!  

I'd be highly surprised if this were the case, given the clubs inability or unwillingness to continue to pump money in to the club to cover the losses. That said, i've always found it baffling why companies as nondescript as FBS or BC.GAME would pay the reported amounts to sponsor us. I get why massive organisations do it but don't see the monetary gain for many others.

  • Like 1
Posted
13 hours ago, davieG said:

A side effect of this is that it has caused a massive inflation of transfer, wages and general costs by clubs trying to compete with them and that has cascaded down the leagues.

 

We broke the rules trying to compete and keep up with them.

Not forgetting the increase in ticket prices and all around optional costs of attending like food, programmes, kit and other stuff from their shops. Overall inflation would have pushed these up but not to the level they've now reached

Posted
9 hours ago, Corky said:

Would clubs willingly give up matchday revenue by reducing the number of clubs?

Of course, assuming the prize money remains the same with these leeches gone. Even the greedy five (lol) will be rubbing their hands at the thought of a main competitor for those UCL spots, TV spots and league winners' cash disappearing overnight.

 

I'd be amazed if it's not a unanimous vote to boot them out.

Posted

The Man City response reminds me of these type of videos you get of dogs who have been caught red handed.

 

Owner: “Flintstone, did you eat the toilet roll?”

Dog: “Errr…. No!! In fact how very dare you!”

 

image.gif.b7334865b482fcce3c74997d03e828a6.gif

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...